Development of the computer-adaptive version of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument.

Background: Having psychometrically strong disability measures that minimize response burden is important in assessing of older adults.Methods: Using the original 48 items from the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument and newly developed items, a 158-item Activity Limitation and a 62-item Pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences Vol. 67; no. 12; pp. 1427 - 1439
Autores principales: McDonough CM, Tian F, Ni P, Kopits IM, Moed R, Pardasaney PK, Jette AM, McDonough, Christine M, Tian, Feng, Ni, Pengsheng, Kopits, Ilona M, Moed, Richard, Pardasaney, Poonam K, Jette, Alan M
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Dec2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104385203&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104385203
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10795006
        JGA
      jtl: Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
      issn: 10795006
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2012
      vid: 67
      iid: 12
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104385203
        83803232
        NLM22546960
        2011757039
        10.1093/gerona/gls108
        NLM22546960
        PMC3670156
        104385203
      ppf: 1427
      ppct: 12
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Development of the computer-adaptive version of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument.
      aug:
        au:
          McDonough CM
          Tian F
          Ni P
          Kopits IM
          Moed R
          Pardasaney PK
          Jette AM
          McDonough, Christine M
          Tian, Feng
          Ni, Pengsheng
          Kopits, Ilona M
          Moed, Richard
          Pardasaney, Poonam K
          Jette, Alan M
        affil: PT, MS, Health & Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street-T5W, Boston, MA, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Disability Evaluation
          Health Status Indicators
          Factor Analysis
          Female
          Human
          Middle Age
          Psychometrics
          Reproducibility of Results
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
      ab: Background: Having psychometrically strong disability measures that minimize response burden is important in assessing of older adults.Methods: Using the original 48 items from the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument and newly developed items, a 158-item Activity Limitation and a 62-item Participation Restriction item pool were developed. The item pools were administered to a convenience sample of 520 community-dwelling adults 60 years or older. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory were employed to identify content structure, calibrate items, and build the computer-adaptive testings (CATs). We evaluated real-data simulations of 10-item CAT subscales. We collected data from 102 older adults to validate the 10-item CATs against the Veteran's Short Form-36 and assessed test-retest reliability in a subsample of 57 subjects.Results: Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a bifactor structure, and multi-dimensional item response theory was used to calibrate an overall Activity Limitation Scale (141 items) and an overall Participation Restriction Scale (55 items). Fit statistics were acceptable (Activity Limitation: comparative fit index = 0.95, Tucker Lewis Index = 0.95, root mean square error approximation = 0.03; Participation Restriction: comparative fit index = 0.95, Tucker Lewis Index = 0.95, root mean square error approximation = 0.05). Correlation of 10-item CATs with full item banks were substantial (Activity Limitation: r = .90; Participation Restriction: r = .95). Test-retest reliability estimates were high (Activity Limitation: r = .85; Participation Restriction r = .80). Strength and pattern of correlations with Veteran's Short Form-36 subscales were as hypothesized. Each CAT, on average, took 3.56 minutes to administer.Conclusions: The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument CATs demonstrated strong reliability, validity, accuracy, and precision. The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument CAT can achieve psychometrically sound disability assessment in older persons while reducing respondent burden. Further research is needed to assess their ability to measure change in older adults.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N