Lack of clinically significant pharmacological interactions between ticagrelor and enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin in healthy subjects.

What is known and Objective: Patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) receive several pharmacological therapies concomitantly, including antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents. As unfractionated heparin (UFH) activates platelets in vitro and in vivo, co-administration with an antiplatelet agent m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics Vol. 37; no. 6; pp. 704 - 712
Autores principales: Teng, R., Butler, K.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:What is known and Objective: Patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) receive several pharmacological therapies concomitantly, including antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents. As unfractionated heparin (UFH) activates platelets in vitro and in vivo, co-administration with an antiplatelet agent may lead to decreased clinical effectiveness of the latter. The aim was therefore to determine any potential drug-drug interactions between the new oral antiplatelet agent ticagrelor, and UFH or enoxaparin. Methods: In two open-label, three-period, crossover trials, healthy subjects were randomized to receive ticagrelor alone or with enoxaparin (study 1) or UFH (study 2), or enoxaparin or UFH alone. Ticagrelor plasma concentrations, inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA), anti-factor Xa levels, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and activated coagulation time (ACT) were measured. Results: Thirty and 28 subjects completed studies 1 and 2, respectively. Study drugs were generally well tolerated, with no significant bleeding or serious adverse events. Co-administration with enoxaparin or UFH had no significant effect on ticagrelor pharmacokinetics. The effect of ticagrelor on IPA was unimpaired by co-administration of enoxaparin, except for a marginal (−2·9%; 908·7%.h, 881·9%.h) reduction in final extent area under the effect curve (AUEC)2-12 (95% CI: −51·6%.h, −2·0%.h). Co-administering UFH with ticagrelor caused small decreases in IPAmax (−3·8%; 94·6%, 91·0%) and AUEC2-12 (−6·8%; 888·6%.h, 828·3%.h) vs. ticagrelor alone (95% CI: final extent IPAmax−5·7%, −1·6%; AUEC2-12−109·8%.h, −10·8%.h). Ticagrelor had no clinically significant effects on enoxaparin as assessed by anti-factor Xa (study 1), or UFH as assessed by aPTT or ACT (study 2). What is new and conclusions: Enoxaparin and UFH had no effect on the pharmacokinetics and no clinically significant effect on the pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor. Ticagrelor had no clinically significant effects on the pharmacodynamics of enoxaparin or UFH.