Administrative data algorithms to identify second breast cancer events following early-stage invasive breast cancer.

Background: Studies of breast cancer outcomes rely on the identification of second breast cancer events (recurrences and second breast primary tumors). Cancer registries often do not capture recurrences, and chart abstraction can be infeasible or expensive. An alternative is using administrative hea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute Vol. 104; no. 12; pp. 931 - 941
Autores principales: Chubak J, Yu O, Pocobelli G, Lamerato L, Webster J, Prout MN, Ulcickas Yood M, Barlow WE, Buist DS, Chubak, Jessica, Yu, Onchee, Pocobelli, Gaia, Lamerato, Lois, Webster, Joe, Prout, Marianne N, Ulcickas Yood, Marianne, Barlow, William E, Buist, Diana S M
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Jun2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104466190&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104466190
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00278874
        JNC
      jtl: JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
      issn: 00278874
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2012
      vid: 104
      iid: 12
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104466190
        NLM22547340
        2011592363
        10.1093/jnci/djs233
        NLM22547340
        PMC3732250
        104466190
      ppf: 931
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Administrative data algorithms to identify second breast cancer events following early-stage invasive breast cancer.
      aug:
        au:
          Chubak J
          Yu O
          Pocobelli G
          Lamerato L
          Webster J
          Prout MN
          Ulcickas Yood M
          Barlow WE
          Buist DS
          Chubak, Jessica
          Yu, Onchee
          Pocobelli, Gaia
          Lamerato, Lois
          Webster, Joe
          Prout, Marianne N
          Ulcickas Yood, Marianne
          Barlow, William E
          Buist, Diana S M
        affil: Group Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Ste. 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Algorithms
          Breast Neoplasms Pathology
          Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast Pathology
          Neoplasms, Second Primary Diagnosis
          Adult
          Aged
          Breast Neoplasms Epidemiology
          Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast Epidemiology
          Health Care Delivery, Integrated
          Female
          Human
          Middle Age
          Neoplasm Staging
          Neoplasms, Second Primary Epidemiology
          Predictive Value of Tests
          Registries, Disease
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Washington
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
      ab: Background: Studies of breast cancer outcomes rely on the identification of second breast cancer events (recurrences and second breast primary tumors). Cancer registries often do not capture recurrences, and chart abstraction can be infeasible or expensive. An alternative is using administrative health-care data to identify second breast cancer events; however, these algorithms must be validated against a gold standard.Methods: We developed algorithms using data from 3152 women in an integrated health-care system who were diagnosed with stage I or II breast cancer in 1993-2006. Medical record review served as the gold standard for second breast cancer events. Administrative data used in algorithm development included procedures, diagnoses, prescription fills, and cancer registry records. We randomly divided the cohort into training and testing samples and used a classification and regression tree analysis to build algorithms for classifying women as having or not having a second breast cancer event. We created several algorithms for researchers to use based on the relative importance of sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) in future studies.Results: The algorithm with high specificity and PPV had 89% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] = 84% to 92%), 99% specificity (95% CI = 98% to 99%), and 90% PPV (95% CI = 86% to 94%); the high-sensitivity algorithm had 96% sensitivity (95% CI = 93% to 98%), 95% specificity (95% CI = 94% to 96%), and 74% PPV (95% CI = 68% to 78%).Conclusions: Algorithms based on administrative data can identify second breast cancer events with high sensitivity, specificity, and PPV. The algorithms presented here promote efficient outcomes research, allowing researchers to prioritize sensitivity, specificity, or PPV in identifying second breast cancer events.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N