Quantitative Paraspinal Muscle Measurements: Inter-Software Reliability and Agreement Using OsiriX and ImageJ.

Background. Variations in paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and composition, particularly of the multifidus muscle, have been of interest with respect to risk of, and recovery from, low back pain problems. Several investigators have reported on the reliability of such muscle measurements...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical Therapy Vol. 92; no. 6; pp. 853 - 865
Main Authors: Fortin, Maryse, Battié, Michele C.
Format: diagnostic images research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Oxford University Press / USA Jun2012
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104467003&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104467003
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00319023
        PTH
      jtl: Physical Therapy
      issn: 00319023
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2012
      vid: 92
      iid: 6
      pid: 10398
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104467003
        77264589
        10.2522/ptj.20110380
        NLM22403091
        104467003
      ppf: 853
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Quantitative Paraspinal Muscle Measurements: Inter-Software Reliability and Agreement Using OsiriX and ImageJ.
      aug:
        au:
          Fortin, Maryse
          Battié, Michele C.
        affil: Student, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Erector Spinae Muscles Anatomy and Histology
          Multifidus Muscles Anatomy and Histology
          Body Weights and Measures
          Software Evaluation
          Image Processing, Computer Assisted
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging
          Low Back Pain Physiopathology
          Measurement Issues and Assessments
          Lumbar Vertebrae Radiography
          Comparative Studies
          Random Sample
          Intrarater Reliability
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Confidence Intervals
          Data Analysis Software
          Signal Processing, Computer Assisted
          Adult
          Female
          Male
          Human
          Funding Source
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Background. Variations in paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and composition, particularly of the multifidus muscle, have been of interest with respect to risk of, and recovery from, low back pain problems. Several investigators have reported on the reliability of such muscle measurements using various protocols and image analysis programs. However, there is no standard protocol for tissue segmentation, nor has there been an investigation of reliability or agreement of measurements using different software. Objective. The purpose of this study was to provide a detailed muscle measurement protocol and determine the reliability and agreement of associated paraspinal muscle composition measurements obtained with 2 commonly used image analysis programs: OsiriX and ImageJ. Design. This was a measurement reliability study. Methods. Lumbar magnetic resonance images of 30 individuals were randomly selected from a cohort of patients with various low back conditions. Muscle CSA and composition measurements were acquired from axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images of the multifidus muscle, the erector spinae muscle, and the 2 muscles combined at L4-L5 and S1 for each participant. All measurements were repeated twice using each software program, at least 5 days apart. The assessor was blinded to all earlier measurements. Results. The intrarater reliability and standard error of measurement (SEM) were comparable for most measurements obtained using OsiriX or ImageJ, with reliability coefficients (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs]) varying between .77 and .99 for OsiriX and .78 and .99 for ImageJ. There was similarly excellent agreement between muscle composition measurements using the 2 software applications (intersoftware ICCs=.81-.99). Limitations. The high degree of inter-software measurement reliability may not generalize to protocols using other commercial or custom-made software. Conclusion. The proposed method to investigate paraspinal muscle CSA, composition, and side-to-side asymmetry was highly reliable, with excellent agreement between the 2 software programs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N