Comparative evaluation of three clinical decision support systems: prospective screening for medication errors in 100 medical inpatients.

Purpose: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are promoted as powerful screening tools to improve pharmacotherapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential contribution of CDSS to patient management in clinical practice. Methods: We prospectively analyzed the pharmacotherapy of 100 med...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Vol. 68; no. 8; pp. 1209 - 1220
Autores principales: Fritz, Daniela, Ceschi, Alessandro, Curkovic, Ivanka, Huber, Martin, Egbring, Marco, Kullak-Ublick, Gerd, Russmann, Stefan
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104476936&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104476936
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00316970
        NP9
      jtl: European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
      issn: 00316970
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2012
      vid: 68
      iid: 8
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104476936
        77736373
        10.1007/s00228-012-1241-6
        NLM22374346
        104476936
      ppf: 1209
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparative evaluation of three clinical decision support systems: prospective screening for medication errors in 100 medical inpatients.
      aug:
        au:
          Fritz, Daniela
          Ceschi, Alessandro
          Curkovic, Ivanka
          Huber, Martin
          Egbring, Marco
          Kullak-Ublick, Gerd
          Russmann, Stefan
        affil: Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100 8091 Zurich Switzerland
      sug:
        subj:
          Medication Errors Prevention and Control
          Decision Making, Computer Assisted Evaluation
          Decision Making, Clinical Evaluation
          Adverse Drug Event Prevention and Control
          Decision Making, Computer Assisted Methods
          Prospective Studies
          Human
          Inpatients
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Academic Medical Centers
          Treatment Outcomes
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Data Analysis Software
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Descriptive Statistics
          Polypharmacy
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Male
          Female
      ab: Purpose: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are promoted as powerful screening tools to improve pharmacotherapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential contribution of CDSS to patient management in clinical practice. Methods: We prospectively analyzed the pharmacotherapy of 100 medical inpatients through the parallel use of three CDSS, namely, Pharmavista, DrugReax, and TheraOpt. After expert discussion that also considered all patient-specific clinical information, we selected apparently relevant alerts, issued suitable recommendations to physicians, and recorded subsequent prescription changes. Results: For 100 patients with a median of eight concomitant drugs, Pharmavista, DrugReax, and TheraOpt generated a total of 53, 362, and 328 interaction alerts, respectively. Among those we identified and forwarded 33 clinically relevant alerts to the attending physician, resulting in 19 prescription changes. Four adverse drug events were associated with interactions. The proportion of clinically relevant alerts among all alerts (positive predictive value) was 5.7, 8.0, and 7.6%, and the sensitivity to detect all 33 relevant alerts was 9.1, 87.9, and 75.8% for Pharmavista, DrugReax and TheraOpt, respectively. TheraOpt recommended 31 dose adjustments, of which we considered 11 to be relevant; three of these were followed by dose reductions. Conclusions: CDSS are valuable screening tools for medication errors, but only a small fraction of their alerts appear relevant in individual patients. In order to avoid overalerting CDSS should use patient-specific information and management-oriented classifications. Comprehensive information should be displayed on-demand, whereas a limited number of computer-triggered alerts that have management implications in the majority of affected patients should be based on locally customized and supported algorithms.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N