Mandibular dimensions of subjects with asymmetric skeletal class III malocclusion and normal occlusion compared with cone-beam computed tomography.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to use cone-beam computed tomography to compare mandibular dimensions in subjects with asymmetric skeletal Class III malocclusion and those with normal occlusion. Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography scans of 38 subjects with normal occlusion and 28 pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics Vol. 142; no. 2; pp. 179 - 186
Autores principales: Lee H, Bayome M, Kim SH, Kim KB, Behrents RG, Kook YA, Lee, HyoYeon, Bayome, Mohamed, Kim, Seong-Hun, Kim, Ki Beom, Behrents, Rolf G, Kook, Yoon-Ah
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Aug2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: The purpose of this study was to use cone-beam computed tomography to compare mandibular dimensions in subjects with asymmetric skeletal Class III malocclusion and those with normal occlusion. Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography scans of 38 subjects with normal occlusion and 28 patients with facial asymmetry were evaluated and digitized with Invivo software (Anatomage, San Jose, Calif). Three midsagittal and 13 right and left measurements were taken. The paired t test was used to compare the right and left sides in each group. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the midsagittal variables and the differences between the 2 sides of the group with normal occlusion with those of asymmetry patients. Results: The posterior part of the mandibular body showed significant differences between the deviated and nondeviated sides in asymmetric Class III patients. The difference of the asymmetry group was significantly greater than that of the normal occlusion group for the mediolateral ramal and the anteroposterior condylar inclinations (P = 0.007 and P = 0.019, respectively). Conclusions: The asymmetric skeletal Class III group showed significant differences in condylar height, ramus height, and posterior part of the mandibular body compared with the subjects with normal occlusion. These results might be useful for diagnosis and treatment planning of asymmetric Class III patients.