Fully Automatable, Reproducible, Noninvasive Simple Plethysmographic Optimization: Proof of Concept and Potential for Implantability.

Background: Hemodynamic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can be achieved reproducibly and-with bulky, nonimplantable equipment-noninvasively. We explored whether a simple photoplethysmogram signal might be used instead. Method: Twenty patients (age 65 ± 12) with CRT underwent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology Vol. 35; no. 8; pp. 948 - 961
Autores principales: Kyriacou, Andreas, Pabari, Punam A., Whinnett, Zachary I., Arri, Satpal, Willson, Keith, Baruah, Resham, Stegemann, Berthold, Mayet, Jamil, Kanagaratnam, Prapa, Hughes, Alun D., Francis, Darrel P.
Formato: research tables/charts tracings Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104487742&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104487742
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01478389
        4F8
      jtl: Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology
      issn: 01478389
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2012
      vid: 35
      iid: 8
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104487742
        78323509
        10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03435.x
        NLM22747698
        104487742
      ppf: 948
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Fully Automatable, Reproducible, Noninvasive Simple Plethysmographic Optimization: Proof of Concept and Potential for Implantability.
      aug:
        au:
          Kyriacou, Andreas
          Pabari, Punam A.
          Whinnett, Zachary I.
          Arri, Satpal
          Willson, Keith
          Baruah, Resham
          Stegemann, Berthold
          Mayet, Jamil
          Kanagaratnam, Prapa
          Hughes, Alun D.
          Francis, Darrel P.
        affil: International Centre for Circulatory Health, St. Mary's Hospital and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
      sug:
        subj:
          Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
          Plethysmography Evaluation
          Heart Failure Classification
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Reproducibility of Results
          Test-Retest Reliability
          Pulse Oximeters
          Blood Pressure Determination
          Pilot Studies
          Noninvasive Procedures
          Electrocardiography
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Hemodynamic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can be achieved reproducibly and-with bulky, nonimplantable equipment-noninvasively. We explored whether a simple photoplethysmogram signal might be used instead. Method: Twenty patients (age 65 ± 12) with CRT underwent automatic atrioventricular (AV) delay optimization, using a multiple-transitions protocol, at two atrially paced heart rates: just above sinus rate ('slow ApVp,' 77 ± 11 beats per minute [bpm]) and 100 bpm ('fast ApVp'). We then retested to assess short-term reproducibility. Results: All 80 optimizations identified an optimum (correctly oriented parabola). At 100 bpm, the simple photoplethysmogram had wider scatter between repeat optimizations than did Finometer: standard deviation of difference (SDD) 22 ms versus 14 ms, respectively, P = 0.028. The simple photoplethysmogram improved in reproducibility when slope (instead of peak) of its signal was used for optimization, becoming as reproducible as Finometer (SDD 14 ms vs 14 ms, P = 0.50). At slow heart rate, reproducibility of simple photoplethysmogram-based optimization worsened from 14 to 22 ms (P = 0.028), and Finometer-based optimization from 14 to 26 ms (P = 0.005). Increasing the number of replicates averaged improved reproducibility. For example, SDD of simple photoplethysmogram optimization (using peak) fell from 62 ms with two replicates to 22 ms with eight replicates (P < 0.0001). At 100 bpm, the eight-replicate protocol takes ∼12 minutes. Conclusions : A 12-minute protocol of simple photoplethysmographic AV optimization can be processed fully automatically. Blinded test-retest reproducibility of the optimum AV is good and improves with more replicates. If benefits to some patients are not to be neutralized by harm to others, endpoint studies should first test check narrowness of 'within-patient error bars.' (PACE 2012; 35:948-960)
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        tracings
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N