Comparison of alphabetical versus categorical display format for medication order entry in a simulated touch screen anesthesia information management system: an experiment in clinician-computer interaction in anesthesia.

Background: Anesthesia information management system (AIMS) records should be designed and configured to facilitate the accurate and prompt recording of multiple drugs administered coincidentally or in rapid succession.Methods: We proposed two touch-screen display formats for use with our department...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making Vol. 12; no. 1; pp. 46 - 47
Autores principales: Marian, Anil A, Dexter, Franklin, Tucker, Peter, Todd, Michael M
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104489616&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104489616
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14726947
        1CI0
      jtl: BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making
      issn: 14726947
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2012
      vid: 12
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104489616
        NLM22643058
        2011645064
        10.1186/1472-6947-12-46
        NLM22643058
        PMC3461477
        104489616
      ppf: 46
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Comparison of alphabetical versus categorical display format for medication order entry in a simulated touch screen anesthesia information management system: an experiment in clinician-computer interaction in anesthesia.
      aug:
        au:
          Marian, Anil A
          Dexter, Franklin
          Tucker, Peter
          Todd, Michael M
        affil: Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, 6JCP, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. anil-marian@uiowa.edu.
      sug:
        subj:
          Anesthesiology Equipment and Supplies
          Computer Terminals
          Computers, Hand-Held Utilization
          Reference Books
          Electronic Order Entry
          User-Computer Interface
          Anesthesiology Labor Supply
          Anesthesiology Standards
          Protocols
          Decision Support Systems, Clinical Administration
          Human
          Internet
          Medication Errors Prevention and Control
          Medication Errors Psychosocial Factors
          Medication Errors Statistics and Numerical Data
          Programming Languages
          Quality Improvement Standards
          Nonparametric Statistics
          Time and Motion Studies
          Work Redesign
      ab: Background: Anesthesia information management system (AIMS) records should be designed and configured to facilitate the accurate and prompt recording of multiple drugs administered coincidentally or in rapid succession.Methods: We proposed two touch-screen display formats for use with our department's new EPIC touch-screen AIMS. In one format, medication "buttons" were arranged in alphabetical order (i.e. A-C, D-H etc.). In the other, buttons were arranged in categories (Common, Fluids, Cardiovascular, Coagulation etc.). Both formats were modeled on an iPad screen to resemble the AIMS interface. Anesthesia residents, anesthesiologists, and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (n = 60) were then asked to find and touch the correct buttons for a series of medications whose names were displayed to the side of the entry screen. The number of entries made within 2 minutes was recorded. This was done 3 times for each format, with the 1st format chosen randomly. Data were analyzed from the third trials with each format to minimize differences in learning.Results: The categorical format had a mean of 5.6 more drugs entered using the categorical method in two minutes than the alphabetical format (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5 to 6.8, P < 0.0001). The findings were the same regardless of the order of testing (i.e. alphabetical-categorical vs. categorical - alphabetical) and participants' years of clinical experience. Most anesthesia providers made no (0) errors for most trials (N = 96/120 trials, lower 95% limit 73%, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in error rates between the two formats (P = 0.53).Conclusions: The use of touch-screen user interfaces in healthcare is increasingly common. Arrangement of drugs names in a categorical display format in the medication order-entry touch screen of an AIMS can result in faster data entry compared to an alphabetical arrangement of drugs. Results of this quality improvement project were used in our department's design of our final intraoperative electronic anesthesia record. This testing approach using cognitive and usability engineering methods can be used to objectively design and evaluate many aspects of the clinician-computer interaction in electronic health records.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N