Working Memory Capacity May Influence Perceived Effort during Aided Speech Recognition in Noise.

Background: Recently there has been interest in using subjective ratings as a measure of perceived effort during speech recognition in noise. Perceived effort may be an indicator of cognitive load. Thus, subjective effort ratings during speech recognition in noise may covary both with signal-to-nois...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Vol. 23; no. 8; pp. 577 - 590
Main Authors: Rudner, Mary, Lunner, Thomas, Behrens, Thomas, Sundewall Thorén, Elisabet, Rönnberg, Jerker
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Thieme Medical Publishing Inc. Sep2012
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104505774&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104505774
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10500545
        9OC
      jtl: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
      issn: 10500545
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2012
      vid: 23
      iid: 8
      pid: 2811
      pub: Thieme Medical Publishing Inc.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104505774
        79778935
        10.3766/jaaa.23.7.7
        NLM22967733
        104505774
      ppf: 577
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Working Memory Capacity May Influence Perceived Effort during Aided Speech Recognition in Noise.
      aug:
        au:
          Rudner, Mary
          Lunner, Thomas
          Behrens, Thomas
          Sundewall Thorén, Elisabet
          Rönnberg, Jerker
        affil: Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Sweden; Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linöping University, Sweden
      sug:
        subj:
          Memory
          Speech Perception
          Noise
          Exertion
          Human
          Experimental Studies
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Audiometry, Pure-Tone
          Visual Analog Scaling
          Male
          Female
          Hearing Disorders
          Word Lists
          Hearing Aid Fitting
          Analysis of Covariance
          Language Tests
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Recently there has been interest in using subjective ratings as a measure of perceived effort during speech recognition in noise. Perceived effort may be an indicator of cognitive load. Thus, subjective effort ratings during speech recognition in noise may covary both with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and individual cognitive capacity. Purpose: The present study investigated the relation between subjective ratings of the effort involved in listening to speech in noise, speech recognition performance, and individual working memory (WM) capacity in hearing impaired hearing aid users. Research Design: In two experiments, participants with hearing loss rated perceived effort during aided speech perception in noise. Noise type and SNR were manipulated in both experiments, and in the second experiment hearing aid compression release settings were also manipulated. Speech recognition performance was measured along with WM capacity. Study Sample: There were 46 participants in all with bilateral mild to moderate sloping hearing loss. In Experiment 1 there were 16 native Danish speakers (eight women and eight men) with a mean age of 63.5 yr (SD--12.1) and average pure tone (PT) threshold of 47. 6 dB (SD--9.8). In Experiment 2 there were 30 native Swedish speakers (19 women and 11 men) with a mean age of 70 yr (SD--7.8) and average PT threshold of 45.8 dB (SD--6.6). Data Collection and Analysis: A visual analog scale (VAS) was used for effort rating in both experiments. In Experiment 1, effort was rated at individually adapted SNRs while in Experiment 2 it was rated at fixed SNRs. Speech recognition in noise performance was measured using adaptive procedures in both experiments with Dantale II sentences in Experiment 1 and Hagerman sentences in Experiment 2. WM capacity was measured using a letter-monitoring task in Experiment 1 and the reading span task in Experiment 2. Results: In both experiments, there was a strong and significant relation between rated effort and SNR that was independent of individual WM capacity, whereas the relation between rated effort and noise type seemed to be influenced by individual WM capacity. Experiment 2 showed that hearing aid compression setting influenced rated effort. Conclusions: Subjective ratings of the effort involved in speech recognition in noise reflect SNRs, and individual cognitive capacity seems to influence relative rating of noise type.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N