Utility of the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument as an Outcome Measure in Patients Participating in Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Preliminary Study.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the concurrent validity of the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and to evaluate the accuracy of information obtained through self-report questionnaire versus interview formats. Methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Physiotherapy Canada Vol. 64; no. 1; pp. 53 - 63
Autor principal: LaPier, Tanya Kinney
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: University of Toronto Press 2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104518724&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104518724
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03000508
        R42
      jtl: Physiotherapy Canada
      issn: 03000508
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2012
      vid: 64
      iid: 1
      pid: 678
      pub: University of Toronto Press
      place: North York, Ontario
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104518724
        71369748
        2011458854
        10.3138/ptc.2010-30
        NLM23277685
        PMC3280709
        104518724
      ppf: 53
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Utility of the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument as an Outcome Measure in Patients Participating in Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Preliminary Study.
      aug:
        au: LaPier, Tanya Kinney
        affil: Department of Physical Therapy, Eastern Washington University
      sug:
        subj:
          Functional Status
          Instrument Validation
          Rehabilitation, Cardiac
          Aged
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Concurrent Validity
          Confidence Intervals
          Data Analysis Software
          Data Analysis, Statistical
          Descriptive Statistics
          Female
          Human
          Interviews
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Male
          Middle Age
          Questionnaires
          Scales
          Self Report
          Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)
          T-Tests
          Test-Retest Reliability
          Validation Studies
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the concurrent validity of the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and to evaluate the accuracy of information obtained through self-report questionnaire versus interview formats. Methods: The study included 29 patients older than 60 years attending an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program. Participants completed the LLFDI, three additional selfreport criterion measures, and six performance-based tests; they completed the LLFDI a second time via interview. We used descriptive statistics, correlations, and t-tests to analyze the data. Results: All LLFDI components were correlated ( r s = 0.36-0.83) with the self-report criterion measures. The Function Component of the LLFDI was moderately correlated with the 6-Minute Walk Test (r= 0.62), timed up-and-go (r =-0.58), walking speed (r =-0.57), and timed sit-to-stand ( r =-0.56) scores. The LLFDI demonstrated a ceiling effect (10%) only in the Disability Limitation component. All LLFDI component scores obtained via self-report questionnaire were correlated with scores obtained via interview; except in a single subcategory, there was no difference between LLFDI scores obtained through self-report questionnaire and those obtained through interview. Conclusions: Results indicate that the LLFDI has appropriate validity for older patients (>60 years) with CHD and can be completed independently by patients rather than administered by clinicians.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N