In Search of the Responsible Subject: History, Philosophy and Social Sciences in Criminal Law Theory.

This paper examines the way in which English criminal law’s conception of responsibility has changed since the eighteenth century, and explores the relationship between changes in legal framework, changes in processes of criminalisation and punishment, and broader social, political and economic chan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Modern Law Review Vol. 64; no. 3; pp. 350 - 372
Autor principal: Lacey, Nicola
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell May2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=10453638&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 10453638
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267961
        D8H
      jtl: Modern Law Review
      issn: 00267961
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2001
      vid: 64
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        10453638
        10.1111/1468-2230.00325
      ppf: 350
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 113KB
      tig:
        atl: In Search of the Responsible Subject: History, Philosophy and Social Sciences in Criminal Law Theory.
      aug:
        au: Lacey, Nicola
        affil: Professor of Criminal Law, London School of Economics
      su:
        Criminal law
        Criminal justice system
      sug:
        subj:
          Criminal law
          Criminal justice system
      keyword:
        Criminal Law
        history
        mens rea
        Responsibility
        subject
      ab: This paper examines the way in which English criminal law’s conception of responsibility has changed since the eighteenth century, and explores the relationship between changes in legal framework, changes in processes of criminalisation and punishment, and broader social, political and economic changes. It argues that the development of ideas of individual responsibility for crime are responses to problems of co-ordination and legitimation faced by systems of criminal law, and that these problems can be expected to change according to the environment in which the system operates, with important factors including the distribution of political interests and economic power; the prevailing cultural and intellectual environment; the organisation and status of relevant professional groups and the vigour of alternative means of social ordering. Substantively, the paper explores the hypothesis that criminal responsibility has shifted from a conception founded in ideas of character to a capacity-based conception over the relevant period. Methodologically, the aim is to historicise the structure as well as the content of criminal law within a socio-theoretic framework, constructing a dialogue between criminal law theory of a doctrinal and philosophical temper and socio-historical studies of criminal justice.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Modern Law Review
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2001
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N