Performance of Conventional and Antimicrobial-Treated Filtering Facepiece Respirators Challenged with Biological Aerosols.

This study evaluated the filtration performance of four commercially available models of National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) against both biological and inert aerosols at a flow rate of 85 L/min. Conventional N95 and P100 FFRs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 69 - 81
Autores principales: Lore, Michael B., Sebastian, John M., Brown, TeAnne L., Viner, Andrew S., McCullough, Nicole V., Hinrichs, Steven H.
Formato: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Feb2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104561507&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104561507
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15459624
        V1L
      jtl: Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene
      issn: 15459624
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2012
      vid: 9
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104561507
        74688753
        10.1080/15459624.2011.640273
        NLM22206440
        104561507
      ppf: 69
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Performance of Conventional and Antimicrobial-Treated Filtering Facepiece Respirators Challenged with Biological Aerosols.
      aug:
        au:
          Lore, Michael B.
          Sebastian, John M.
          Brown, TeAnne L.
          Viner, Andrew S.
          McCullough, Nicole V.
          Hinrichs, Steven H.
        affil: Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center
      sug:
        subj:
          Occupational Exposure Prevention and Control
          Respiratory Protective Devices Evaluation
          Face
          Antiinfective Agents
          Human
          Florida
          National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
          Respiratory Protective Devices Classification
          Aerosols Classification
          Filtration Evaluation
          Analysis of Variance
          Funding Source
      ab: This study evaluated the filtration performance of four commercially available models of National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) against both biological and inert aerosols at a flow rate of 85 L/min. Conventional N95 and P100 FFRs and two antimicrobial (AM)-treated FFRs (an N95 and a P95, both with iodine-based AM treatments) were tested for both physical penetration (PENP) and viable penetration (PENV) with three different bioaerosols, including MS2 bacteriophage virus, and the spores and vegetative cells of Bacillus atrophaeus bacteria, in addition to inert sodium chloride (NaCl) aerosol. For each FFR model, the PENP measured with NaCl was predictive of its MS2 PENP, and it was observed that spores and bacteria aerosols were also filtered similarly to the inert aerosol. For both conventional FFRs, up to a 1-log reduction in PENV in comparison with PENP was observed and attributed to the experimental variability of the test system. For both models of AM-FFRs, no statistically significant differences between PENV and PENP for any of the three different bioaerosol challenges were observed. Thus, no bioaerosol filtration enhancement over the conventional FFRs was detected for either iodine-based AM-FFR. In the absence of any standardized test methods, we recommend that future studies evaluating the filtration performance of AM-treated FFRs incorporate the experimental best practices described herein. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene for the following free supplemental resource: a pdf file containing I. Review of Research on Antimicrobial-Treated Respirators, and II. Microorganism Propagation, Plating, and Enumeration Protocols.]
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        equations & formulas
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N