Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: perspectives from a PROMIS meeting.
Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) has been a focus of debate since the 2006 publication of the U.S. FDA Draft Guidance for Industry in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement. Under the auspices of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiati...
| Publicado en: | Quality of Life Research Vol. 21; no. 5; pp. 739 - 747 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2012
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104566498&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104566498 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09629343 GPQ jtl: Quality of Life Research issn: 09629343 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2012 vid: 21 iid: 5 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 104566498 NLM21866374 2011548474 10.1007/s11136-011-9990-8 NLM21866374 104566498 ppf: 739 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: perspectives from a PROMIS meeting. aug: au: Magasi S Ryan G Revicki D Lenderking W Hays RD Brod M Snyder C Boers M Cella D Magasi, Susan Ryan, Gery Revicki, Dennis Lenderking, William Hays, Ron D Brod, Meryl Snyder, Claire Boers, Maarten Cella, David affil: Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 625 Michigan Ave., Suite 2700, Chicago, IL 60611, USA sug: subj: Outcome Assessment Methods Self Report Human Psychometrics Qualitative Studies Reproducibility of Results ab: Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) has been a focus of debate since the 2006 publication of the U.S. FDA Draft Guidance for Industry in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement. Under the auspices of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative, a working meeting on content validity was convened with leading PRO measurement experts. Platform presentations and participant discussion highlighted key issues in the content validity debate, including inconsistency in the definition and evaluation of content validity, the need for empirical research to support methodological approaches to the evaluation of content validity, and concerns that continual re-evaluation of content validity slows the pace of science and leads to the proliferation of study-specific PROs. We advocate an approach to the evaluation of content validity, which includes meticulously documented qualitative and advanced quantitative methods. To advance the science of content validity in PROs, we recommend (1) development of a consensus definition of content validity; (2) development of content validity guidelines that delineate the role of qualitative and quantitative methods and the integration of multiple perspectives; (3) empirical evaluation of generalizability of content validity across applications; and (4) use of generic measures as the foundation for PROs assessment. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|