Social Class Affiliation and Ethnic Prejudice.

The article studies various aspects of social class, affiliation and ethnic prejudice. It is observed that despite the progress in the social class concept there exists a dearth of consensus in the field of social stratification. The disagreement embraces every phase of the field, its concept, metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Comparative Sociology (Brill Academic Publishers) Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 245 - 265
Autor principal: Rosenblum, A. Leon
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers Sep67
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=10457804&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 10457804
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00207152
        ICS
      jtl: International Journal of Comparative Sociology (Brill Academic Publishers)
      issn: 00207152
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep67
      vid: 8
      iid: 2
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        10457804
        10.1177/002071526700800209
      ppf: 245
      ppct: 20
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Social Class Affiliation and Ethnic Prejudice.
      aug:
        au: Rosenblum, A. Leon
        affil: San Fernando Valley State College
      su:
        Social classes
        Affiliation (Psychology)
        Ethnic relations
        Prejudices
        Social structure
        Social science methodology
      sug:
        subj:
          Social classes
          Affiliation (Psychology)
          Ethnic relations
          Prejudices
          Social structure
          Social science methodology
      ab: The article studies various aspects of social class, affiliation and ethnic prejudice. It is observed that despite the progress in the social class concept there exists a dearth of consensus in the field of social stratification. The disagreement embraces every phase of the field, its concept, methodology and findings. General agreement seems to have been accomplished on one point in the social class phenomena, and that says that differences in social class affiliation should have a bearing on differential social behavior. It is generally agreed that without the distinction of differential behavior on the part of the different segments of society there would be no purpose in its study. The article makes an attempt to close the gap one step toward a codification of the class concept. In line with the theoretical frame of reference and the hypothesis that differential social class affiliation will be seen in differential behavior attitudes, the article considers the variables of prejudice and religiosity. It is also the concern of this study to verify the usefulness of the mailed questionnaire approach to gathering social phenomena data. The problem of the mailed questionnaire approach with its accompanying drawback of the relatively small percentage of returns and from making inference to the universe of discourse has as yet not been solved.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1967
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N