Advancing the practice of cognitive task analysis: a call for taxonomic research.
Cognitive task analysis (CTA) captures unobservable cognitive processes, decisions and judgments of expert performance. Over 100 different CTA methods are identified in prior literature. However, existing classifications typically sort techniques by process rather than outcome, application or causal...
| Publicado en: | Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science Vol. 12; no. 6; pp. 472 - 496 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Nov2011
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104589950&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104589950 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 1463922X BDX jtl: Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science issn: 1463922X maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Nov2011 vid: 12 iid: 6 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 104589950 66646058 10.1080/1463922X.2010.505269 104589950 ppf: 472 ppct: 24 formats: tig: atl: Advancing the practice of cognitive task analysis: a call for taxonomic research. aug: au: Yates, Kenneth A. Feldon, David F. affil: Center for Cognitive Technology, University of Southern California, USA sug: subj: Task Performance and Analysis Classification Cognition Task Performance and Analysis Methods Classification Systematic Review Decision Making Knowledge Models, Theoretical Goals and Objectives Validation Studies Psycinfo ERIC Database Skill Acquisition Descriptive Statistics Content Analysis ab: Cognitive task analysis (CTA) captures unobservable cognitive processes, decisions and judgments of expert performance. Over 100 different CTA methods are identified in prior literature. However, existing classifications typically sort techniques by process rather than outcome, application or causal mechanism. Therefore, techniques can be misapplied and comparative analysis of methods made difficult. Based on the frequency distribution of CTA methods in 1065 studies, a subsample representing 60% of the most frequently published methods was coded based on elicitation and analysis techniques. Consistency of resulting applications was assessed. Inconsistent matching of CTA methods and subsequent applications indicate CTA is currently more craft than technology. Therefore, there is no robust basis for selecting one method over another for research or practice. Specific challenges include comparing the reliability and validity of individual methods and optimising selection of techniques for intended applications. Developing a causal taxonomy may facilitate such advancements. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|