Modern Triage in the Emergency Department.

Background: Because the volume of patient admissions to an emergency department (ED) cannot be precisely planned, the available resources may become overwhelmed at times ("crowding"), with resulting risks for patient safety. The aim of this study is to identify modern triage instruments and assess t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Deutsches Ärzteblatt International Vol. 107; no. 50; pp. 892 - 899
Autores principales: Christ, Michael, Grossmann, Florian, Winter, Daniela, Bingisser, Roland, Platz, Elke
Formato: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Deutscher Aerzte-Verlag GmbH 12/17/2010
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104591732&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104591732
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        18660452
        5F0N
      jtl: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International
      issn: 18660452
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 12/17/2010
      vid: 107
      iid: 50
      pid: 25312
      pub: Deutscher Aerzte-Verlag GmbH
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104591732
        66637351
        10.3238/arztebl.2010.0892
        104591732
      ppf: 892
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Modern Triage in the Emergency Department.
      aug:
        au:
          Christ, Michael
          Grossmann, Florian
          Winter, Daniela
          Bingisser, Roland
          Platz, Elke
        affil: Interdisziplinäre Notaufnahmen, Klinikum Nürnberg
      sug:
        subj:
          Triage Methods
          Crowding Prevention and Control
          Nursing Role
          Patient Safety
          Human
          Germany
          Medline
          Scales
          Clinical Assessment Tools
      ab: Background: Because the volume of patient admissions to an emergency department (ED) cannot be precisely planned, the available resources may become overwhelmed at times ("crowding"), with resulting risks for patient safety. The aim of this study is to identify modern triage instruments and assess their validity and reliability. Methods: Review of selected literature retrieved by a search on the terms "emergency department" and "triage." Results: Emergency departments around the world use different triage systems to assess the severity of incoming patients' conditions and assign treatment priorities. Our study identified four such instruments: the Australasian Triage Scale (ATS), the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), the Manchester Triage System (MTS), and the Emergency Se verity Index (ESI). Triage instruments with 5 levels are superior to those with 3 levels in both validity and reliability (p<0.01). Good to very good reliability has been shown for the best-studied instruments, CTAS and ESI (?-statistics: 0.7 to 0.95), while ATS and MTS have been found to be only moderately reliable (?-statistics: 0.3 to 0.6). MTS and ESI are both available in German; of these two, only the ESI has been validated in German-speaking countries. Conclusion: Five-level triage systems are valid and reliable methods for assessment of the severity of incoming patients' conditions by nursing staff in the emergency department. They should be used in German emergency departments to assign treatment priorities in a structured and dependable fashion.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N