Validity of Using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills to Determine the Need for Assistance.
OBJECTIVE. This study evaluated the validity of using Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) measures as evidence of the need for assistance in the community. METHOD. In a retrospective analysis of existing data (N = 64,466), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and...
| Publicado en: | American Journal of Occupational Therapy Vol. 65; no. 6; pp. 643 - 651 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
American Occupational Therapy Association
Nov/Dec2011
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104599021&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104599021 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02729490 44I jtl: American Journal of Occupational Therapy issn: 02729490 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov/Dec2011 vid: 65 iid: 6 pid: 6680 pub: American Occupational Therapy Association place: North Bethesda, Maryland artinfo: ui: 104599021 67217959 10.5014/ajot.2011.000547 NLM22214108 104599021 ppf: 643 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Validity of Using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills to Determine the Need for Assistance. aug: au: Merritt, Brenda K. affil: Assistant Professor, School of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Room 215, 5869 University Avenue, PO Box 15000, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2 Canada sug: subj: Disability Evaluation Instrument Validation Task Performance and Analysis Human Clinical Assessment Tools Retrospective Design ROC Curve Activities of Daily Living Sensitivity and Specificity Validation Studies Colorado Motor Skills Evaluation Rasch Analysis One-Way Analysis of Variance Data Analysis Software Random Sample Functional Assessment ab: OBJECTIVE. This study evaluated the validity of using Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) measures as evidence of the need for assistance in the community. METHOD. In a retrospective analysis of existing data (N = 64,466), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and a split-sample method was used to validate the predictions. RESULTS. When identifying people who need assistance versus those who do not need assistance in the community, activity of daily living (ADL) motor and ADL process measures have fair and good discriminating value, respectively (areas under the ROC curves were .78 and .84). Evidence supports placing ADL motor and ADL process independence cutoff measures at 1.50 logits (sensitivity = .67, specificity = .72) and 1.00 logit (sensitivity = .81, specificity = .70), respectively. Accuracy was highest when matched motor and process decisions occurred (sensitivity = .85, specificity = .83). CONCLUSION. Evidence supports using ADL ability measures from the AMPS to provide evidence of a client's need for assistance in the community. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|