Performance-Based Versus Patient- Reported Physical Function: What Are the Underlying Predictors?

Background. Functional limitations have been operationally defined for studies of rehabilitation science through measures of physical performance and patient-reported function. Although conceived as representing similar concepts, differences between these 2 modes of measuring physical functioning ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical Therapy Vol. 91; no. 12; pp. 1804 - 1812
Main Authors: Bean, Jonathan F., Ölveczky, Daniele D., Kiely, Dan K., LaRose, Sharon I., Jette, Alan M.
Format: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Published: Oxford University Press / USA Dec2011
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104626847&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104626847
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00319023
        PTH
      jtl: Physical Therapy
      issn: 00319023
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2011
      vid: 91
      iid: 12
      pid: 10398
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104626847
        70250959
        10.2522/ptj.20100417
        104626847
      ppf: 1804
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Performance-Based Versus Patient- Reported Physical Function: What Are the Underlying Predictors?
      aug:
        au:
          Bean, Jonathan F.
          Ölveczky, Daniele D.
          Kiely, Dan K.
          LaRose, Sharon I.
          Jette, Alan M.
        affil: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, and Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
      sug:
        subj:
          Geriatric Functional Assessment Methods
          Health Status Evaluation
          Psychological Well-Being Evaluation
          Rehabilitation, Geriatric
          Human
          Funding Source
          Comparative Studies
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Community Living In Old Age
          Random Assignment
          Intervention Trials
          Therapeutic Exercise In Old Age
          Exercise Physiology In Old Age
          Body Mass Index Evaluation
          Exercise Test, Muscular In Old Age
          Exercise Test, Cardiopulmonary In Old Age
          Physical Endurance Evaluation
          Comorbidity In Old Age
          Depression In Old Age
          Accidental Falls In Old Age
          Self-Efficacy In Old Age
          Cognition Evaluation
          Neuropsychological Tests
          Treadmills In Old Age
          Leg Physiology
          Exertion Evaluation
          Scales
          Reliability and Validity
          Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale
          Psychological Tests
          Male
          Female
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Aged
          Descriptive Statistics
          Multivariate Analysis
          Regression
          Forecasting
          Step-Wise Multiple Regression
          Data Analysis Software
          Self Report In Old Age
          Aged, 80 & over
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background. Functional limitations have been operationally defined for studies of rehabilitation science through measures of physical performance and patient-reported function. Although conceived as representing similar concepts, differences between these 2 modes of measuring physical functioning have not been adequately characterized scientifically. Objective. The purpose of this study was to compare the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) with the function component of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) with respect to their association with physiologic factors and other psychosocial and health factors potentially influencing rehabilitative care. Design. This study was a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a sample of community-dwelling older adults (N137) with mobility limitations enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of exercise. Methods. A performance-based measure of function (the SPPB) and a self-report measure of function (the LLFDI) served as functional outcomes. Physiologic factors included measures of leg strength, leg velocity, and exercise tolerance test (ETT) duration, which served as a surrogate measure of aerobic capacity. Psychosocial and health factors included age, sex, height, body mass index, number of chronic conditions, depression, and falls efficacy. Results. Separate multivariable regression models predicting SPPB and LLFDI scores described 33% and 42% of the variance in each outcome (R2), respectively. Leg velocity and ETT duration were positively associated with both performance-based and patient-reported functional measures. Leg strength and age were positively associated with SPPB scores, whereas number of chronic conditions, sex, and falls efficacy were associated with the LLFDI scores. Limitations. This study included older adults with mobility limitations and may not generalize to other populations. Conclusions. Performance-based and patient-reported measures of physical function appear to assess different aspects of an older person's functioning. The SPPB was associated with age and physiologic factors, whereas patient-reported function measured by the LLFDI was associated with these factors as well as with psychosocial and health factors.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N