Analysis of complex team-based systems: augmentations to goal-directed task analysis and cognitive work analysis.
This research modified two analysis techniques, goal-directed task analysis (GDTA) and modified cognitive work analysis (mCWA), in order to apply them to the analysis of a complex team-based system. Traditionally, GDTA and mCWA have been applied to narrowly focused physical-based domains; however, t...
| Publicado en: | Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science Vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 149 - 176 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Mar2011
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104647287&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104647287 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 1463922X BDX jtl: Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science issn: 1463922X maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Mar2011 vid: 12 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 104647287 61305916 10.1080/14639221003602473 104647287 ppf: 149 ppct: 27 formats: tig: atl: Analysis of complex team-based systems: augmentations to goal-directed task analysis and cognitive work analysis. aug: au: Humphrey, Curtis M. Adams, Julie A. affil: Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA sug: subj: Task Performance and Analysis Disaster Planning Equipment and Supplies Robotics Goals and Objectives Human Diffusion of Innovation Interviews Cognition Decision Making Funding Source ab: This research modified two analysis techniques, goal-directed task analysis (GDTA) and modified cognitive work analysis (mCWA), in order to apply them to the analysis of a complex team-based system. Traditionally, GDTA and mCWA have been applied to narrowly focused physical-based domains; however, the chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive (CBRNE) incident response domain is a very complex domain in which individual humans and teams of humans with specialised skills and responsibilities are considered to be system components. The resulting system combines very large number of components, decision-makers and uncertain environmental issues. Each analysis technique provided strengths that complemented the other's weaknesses; however, the analysis techniques required augmentations in order to facilitate information capture and correspondence to design requirements. The contributions of this article include a presentation of the augmentations and a discussion of the benefits provided by employing both analysis techniques. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|