Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part I: Perceptual and computer performances in cycle pattern recognition.

The limit of about 5% for reliable quantification of jitter in sustained vowels of dysphonic voices--a widely accepted guideline--deserves critical analysis. The present study pertains to the effect of experience and training on the perceptual (visual) capability of correctly identifying periods in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 70 - 78
Autores principales: DeJonckere, Philippe, Schoentgen, Jean, Giordano, Andrea, Fraj, Samia, Bocchi, Leonardo, Manfredi, Claudia
Formato: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jul2011
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104647678&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104647678
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14015439
        BAK
      jtl: Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology
      issn: 14015439
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2011
      vid: 36
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104647678
        61407096
        10.3109/14015439.2011.578078
        NLM21689056
        104647678
      ppf: 70
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part I: Perceptual and computer performances in cycle pattern recognition.
      aug:
        au:
          DeJonckere, Philippe
          Schoentgen, Jean
          Giordano, Andrea
          Fraj, Samia
          Bocchi, Leonardo
          Manfredi, Claudia
      sug:
        subj:
          Voice Physiology
          Phonetics
          Human
          United States
          Analysis of Variance
      ab: The limit of about 5% for reliable quantification of jitter in sustained vowels of dysphonic voices--a widely accepted guideline--deserves critical analysis. The present study pertains to the effect of experience and training on the perceptual (visual) capability of correctly identifying periods in (highly) perturbed signals, and to a comparison of the performance of several programs for voice analysis. Synthesized realistic vowels (/a:/) with exactly known jitter (2.7%--31.5%) are used as material. After selection and training, experienced raters demonstrate excellent agreement in correctly identifying periods up to high values of jitter put in. Perceptual rating outperforms all computer programs in accuracy. Most remain reliable up to 10% jitter; one of them correctly measures up to the highest level.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        equations & formulas
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N