Justice, Fairness, and Membership in a Class: Conceptual Confusions and Moral Puzzles in the Regulation of Human Subjects Research.
This essay examines conceptual difficulties with one of the ways in which justice has been understood and applied the ethical and regulatory review of human research. Justice requires the fair distribution of the benefits and burdens of research. Class membership is seen as justifying inclusion in h...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 488 - 502 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Fall2011
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104675113&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104675113 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10731105 JME jtl: Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics issn: 10731105 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Fall2011 vid: 39 iid: 3 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 104675113 64501034 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00616.x NLM21871044 104675113 ppf: 488 ppct: 14 formats: tig: atl: Justice, Fairness, and Membership in a Class: Conceptual Confusions and Moral Puzzles in the Regulation of Human Subjects Research. aug: au: Iltis, Ana S. affil: Director of the Center for Bioethics, Health and Society at Wake Forest University and an Associate Professor of Philosophy. sug: subj: Social Justice Research Subjects Ethical Issues Named Groups Research Subjects Legislation and Jurisprudence United States Research, Medical Ethical Issues Parents Research Subject Recruitment ab: This essay examines conceptual difficulties with one of the ways in which justice has been understood and applied the ethical and regulatory review of human research. Justice requires the fair distribution of the benefits and burdens of research. Class membership is seen as justifying inclusion in higher hazard-no benefit research from which members of potentially vulnerable classes, such as children, typically would be excluded. I argue that class membership does not do the justificatory work it is thought to do and that the use of class membership to justify inclusion in higher hazard-no benefit research leads to unjustified discrimination of sick children and offers special protections to healthy children. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|