A case for the use of Q-methodology in disability research: lessons learned from a training workshop.
Purpose. Q-methodology was developed to analyse subjective responses to a range of items dealing with specific topics. This article describes the use of Q-methodology and presents the results of a Q-study on perspectives on disability carried out in a training workshop as evidence for its usefulness...
| Published in: | Disability & Rehabilitation Vol. 33; no. 21; pp. 2134 - 2142 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Oct2011
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104692281&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104692281 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09638288 B73 jtl: Disability & Rehabilitation issn: 09638288 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Oct2011 vid: 33 iid: 21 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 104692281 65960796 2011291815 10.3109/09638288.2011.560327 NLM21401331 104692281 ppf: 2134 ppct: 8 formats: tig: atl: A case for the use of Q-methodology in disability research: lessons learned from a training workshop. aug: au: Mckenzie, Judith Braswell, Bob Jelsma, Jennifer Naidoo, Nirmala affil: Department of Psychology, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa sug: subj: Persons with Disabilities Research, Medical Research Methodology Seminars and Workshops Human Questionnaires Data Analysis Software Factor Analysis ab: Purpose. Q-methodology was developed to analyse subjective responses to a range of items dealing with specific topics. This article describes the use of Q-methodology and presents the results of a Q-study on perspectives on disability carried out in a training workshop as evidence for its usefulness in disability research. Method. A Q-sort was administered in the context of a training workshop on Q-method. The Q-sort consisted of statements related to the topic of disability. The responses were analysed using specifically developed software to identify factors that represent patterns of responses. Results. Twenty-two of the 23 respondents loaded on four factors. These factors appeared to represent different paradigms relating to the social, medical and disability rights models of disability. The fourth factor appeared to be that of a family perspective. These are all models evident in the disability research literature and provide evidence for the validity of Q-method in disability research. Conclusion. Based on this opportunistic study, it would appear that Q-methodology is a useful tool for identifying different view points related to disability. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|