Measuring social class differences in cancer patient survival: is it necessary to control for social class differences in general population mortality? A Finnish population-based study.

Estimation of cancer patient survival by social class has been performed using observed, corrected (cause specific), and relative (with expected survival based on the national population) survival rates. Each of these measures are potentially biased and the optimal method is to calculate relative su...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health Vol. 52; no. 11; pp. 727 - 735
Main Authors: Dickman, P W, Auvinen, A, Voutilainen, E T, Hakulinen, T
Format: research Journal Article
Published: BMJ Publishing Group Nov1998
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104717290&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104717290
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0143005X
        C0H
      jtl: Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
      issn: 0143005X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov1998
      vid: 52
      iid: 11
      pid: 8280
      pub: BMJ Publishing Group
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104717290
        104717290
        2011074918
        10.1136/jech.52.11.727
        NLM10396505
        PMC1756645
        104717290
      ppf: 727
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Measuring social class differences in cancer patient survival: is it necessary to control for social class differences in general population mortality? A Finnish population-based study.
      aug:
        au:
          Dickman, P W
          Auvinen, A
          Voutilainen, E T
          Hakulinen, T
        affil: Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
      sug:
        subj:
          Neoplasms Mortality
          Social Class
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Aged
          Cause of Death
          Child
          Child, Preschool
          Female
          Finland
          Human
          Infant
          Infant, Newborn
          Male
          Middle Age
          Regression
          Survival
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Child: 6-12 years
          Child, Preschool: 2-5 years
          Infant: 1-23 months
          Infant, Newborn: birth-1 month
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Estimation of cancer patient survival by social class has been performed using observed, corrected (cause specific), and relative (with expected survival based on the national population) survival rates. Each of these measures are potentially biased and the optimal method is to calculate relative survival rates using social class specific death rates to estimate expected survival. This study determined the degree to which the choice of survival measure affects the estimation of social class differences in cancer patient survival. All Finnish residents diagnosed with at least one of 10 common malignant neoplasms during the period 1977-1985 were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry and followed up for deaths to the end of 1992. Survival rates were calculated by site, sex, and age at 5, 10, and 15 years subsequent to diagnosis for each of three measures of survival; relative survival, corrected (cause specific) survival, and relative survival adjusted for social class differences in general mortality. Regression models were fitted to each set of rates for the first five years of follow up. The degree of variation in relative survival resulting from social class decreased, although did not disappear, after controlling for social class differences in general mortality. The results obtained using corrected survival were close to those obtained using relative survival with a social class correction. The differences between the three measures were largest when the proportion of deaths from other causes was large, for example, in cancers with high survival, among older patients, and for longer follow up times. Although each of the three measures gave comparable results, it is recommended that relative survival rates are used with expected survival adjusted for social class when studying social class variation in cancer patient survival. If this is not an available option, it is recommended that corrected survival rates are used. Relative survival rates without the social class correction overestimate social class differences and should be used with caution.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N