Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality.

Abstract Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative impact of different forms of hearing aid signal processing on quality ratings of music. Design: Music quality was assessed using a rating scale for three types of music: orchestral classical music, jazz instrumental, and a f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Audiology Vol. 50; no. 3; pp. 177 - 191
Main Authors: Arehart, Kathryn H., Kates, James M., Anderson, Melinda C.
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Mar2011
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104814446&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104814446
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14992027
        JW2
      jtl: International Journal of Audiology
      issn: 14992027
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2011
      vid: 50
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104814446
        58059445
        10.3109/14992027.2010.539273
        NLM21319935
        104814446
      ppf: 177
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality.
      aug:
        au:
          Arehart, Kathryn H.
          Kates, James M.
          Anderson, Melinda C.
        affil: Department of Speech, Language, Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Noise
          Music Evaluation
          Quality Assessment Methods
          Hearing Aids Evaluation
          Human
          Speech Acoustics Evaluation
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Hearing Disorders
          Funding Source
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
      ab: Abstract Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative impact of different forms of hearing aid signal processing on quality ratings of music. Design: Music quality was assessed using a rating scale for three types of music: orchestral classical music, jazz instrumental, and a female vocalist. The music stimuli were subjected to a wide range of simulated hearing aid processing conditions including, (1) noise and nonlinear processing, (2) linear filtering, and (3) combinations of noise, nonlinear, and linear filtering. Study sample: Quality ratings were measured in a group of 19 listeners with normal hearing and a group of 15 listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. Results: Quality ratings in both groups were generally comparable, were reliable across test sessions, were impacted more by noise and nonlinear signal processing than by linear filtering, and were significantly affected by the genre of music. Conclusions: The average quality ratings for music were reasonably well predicted by the hearing aid speech quality index (HASQI), but additional work is needed to optimize the index to the wide range of music genres and processing conditions included in this study. Sumario Objetivo: El propóósito de este estudio fue determinar el impacto relativo de diferentes formas de procesamiento de seññal de los auxiliares auditivos en cuanto a la calificacióón cualitativa de la múúsica. Diseñño: la calidad de la múúsica se evaluóó utilizando una escala de calificacióón para tres tipos de múúsica: cláásica orquestral, jazz instrumental y mujer vocalista. Los estíímulos musicales estuvieron sujetos a un amplio núúmero de simulaciones de procesamiento de los auxiliares auditivos, incluyendo (1) ruido y procesamiento no-linear, (2) filtracióón linear y (3) combinaciones de ruido, no-linear y filtracióón linear. Mestra: Se obtuvieron los ííndices de calidad en un grupo de 19 sujetos normoyentes y otro grupo de 15 sujetos con hipoacusia sensorineural. Resultados: Las calificaciones cualitativas en ambos grupos fueron generalmente comparables, confiables en las diferentes sesiones, fueron máás alteradas por el ruido y por el procesamiento no linear de la seññal que por la filtracióón linear y fueron afectadas significativamente por el géénero de la múúsica. Conclusiones: El ííndice de calidad del lenguaje de los auxiliares auditivos (HASQI), pronosticóó razonablemente bien el promedio de calificacióón de la calidad de la múúsica, pero todavíía es necesario continuar la investigacióón para optimizar el ííndice para que ééste pueda cubrir una gama máás amplia de gééneros y condiciones de procesamiento incluidas en este estudio.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N