Dosimetric effect of intrafraction motion and residual setup error for hypofractionated prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy with online cone beam computed tomography image guidance.

Purpose: To quantify the dosimetric effect and margins required to account for prostate intrafractional translation and residual setup error in a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided hypofractionated radiotherapy protocol.Methods and Materials: Prostate position after online correction was me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics Vol. 80; no. 2; pp. 453 - 462
Autores principales: Adamson J, Wu Q, Yan D, Adamson, Justus, Wu, Qiuwen, Yan, Di
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science Jun2011
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104891688&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104891688
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03603016
        1ZQ
      jtl: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
      issn: 03603016
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2011
      vid: 80
      iid: 2
      pid: 2410
      pub: Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104891688
        NLM20646842
        2011041358
        10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.033
        NLM20646842
        PMC3010484
        104891688
      ppf: 453
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Dosimetric effect of intrafraction motion and residual setup error for hypofractionated prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy with online cone beam computed tomography image guidance.
      aug:
        au:
          Adamson J
          Wu Q
          Yan D
          Adamson, Justus
          Wu, Qiuwen
          Yan, Di
        affil: Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed Methods
          Movement
          Prostatic Neoplasms Radiography
          Prostatic Neoplasms Radiotherapy
          Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted Methods
          Radiotherapy, Conformal Methods
          Algorithms
          Radiation Dosage
          Gold
          Male
          Patient Positioning
          Prostate Radiography
          Prostatic Neoplasms Pathology
          Body Weights and Measures
          Male
      ab: Purpose: To quantify the dosimetric effect and margins required to account for prostate intrafractional translation and residual setup error in a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided hypofractionated radiotherapy protocol.Methods and Materials: Prostate position after online correction was measured during dose delivery using simultaneous kV fluoroscopy and posttreatment CBCT in 572 fractions to 30 patients. We reconstructed the dose distribution to the clinical tumor volume (CTV) using a convolution of the static dose with a probability density function (PDF) based on the kV fluoroscopy, and we calculated the minimum dose received by 99% of the CTV (D(99)). We compared reconstructed doses when the convolution was performed per beam, per patient, and when the PDF was created using posttreatment CBCT. We determined the minimum axis-specific margins to limit CTV D(99) reduction to 1%.Results: For 3-mm margins, D(99) reduction was ≤5% for 29/30 patients. Using post-CBCT rather than localizations at treatment delivery exaggerated dosimetric effects by ~47%, while there was no such bias between the dose convolved with a beam-specific and patient-specific PDF. After eight fractions, final cumulative D(99) could be predicted with a root mean square error of <1%. For 90% of patients, the required margins were ≤2, 4, and 3 mm, with 70%, 40%, and 33% of patients requiring no right-left (RL), anteroposterior (AP), and superoinferior margins, respectively.Conclusions: For protocols with CBCT guidance, RL, AP, and SI margins of 2, 4, and 3 mm are sufficient to account for translational errors; however, the large variation in patient-specific margins suggests that adaptive management may be beneficial.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N