Similar cardiovascular risk factor profile in screen-detected and known type 2 diabetic subjects.

Objective. To compare the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor profile in subjects with screen-detected type 2 diabetes (SDM) and subjects with known type 2 diabetes (KDM). Design. Population-based, cross-sectional survey. Setting and subjects. In a single, semi-rural general practice 2082 subje...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care Vol. 29; no. 2; pp. 85 - 92
Autores principales: Heldgaard, Poul Erik, Henriksen, Jan Erik, Sidelmann, Johannes J., Olivarius, Niels de Fine, Siersma, Volkert D., Gram, Jøørgen B.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jun2011
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104898485&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104898485
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02813432
        BDB
      jtl: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
      issn: 02813432
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2011
      vid: 29
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104898485
        60674476
        10.3109/02813432.2011.565164
        NLM21438763
        104898485
      ppf: 85
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Similar cardiovascular risk factor profile in screen-detected and known type 2 diabetic subjects.
      aug:
        au:
          Heldgaard, Poul Erik
          Henriksen, Jan Erik
          Sidelmann, Johannes J.
          Olivarius, Niels de Fine
          Siersma, Volkert D.
          Gram, Jøørgen B.
        affil: ØØrum Health Centre, Tjele; The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen
      sug:
        subj:
          Cardiovascular Risk Factors
          Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Epidemiology
          Funding Source
          Human
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Surveys
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Male
          Female
          Self Report
          Questionnaires
          Descriptive Statistics
          P-Value
          Glycated Hemoglobin Blood
          Glycemic Control
          Denmark
          Insulin Blood
          Urinalysis
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Fisher's Exact Test
          Two-Tailed Test
          Data Analysis, Statistical
          Data Analysis Software
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Objective. To compare the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor profile in subjects with screen-detected type 2 diabetes (SDM) and subjects with known type 2 diabetes (KDM). Design. Population-based, cross-sectional survey. Setting and subjects. In a single, semi-rural general practice 2082 subjects were between 20 and 69 years. Of those, 1970 subjects were invited, and a total of 1374 (69.7%) subjects were examined by blood tests, anthropometric measures, and self-administered questionnaires. Results. Before the survey 19 persons were known to have type 2 diabetes. The screening revealed another 31 individuals with type 2 diabetes, diagnosed according to the 1999 World Health Organization criteria. Age, levels of blood pressure, BMI, and dyslipidaemia, and markers of haemostasis and inflammation were comparable in the two groups. Median age in the KDM group was 58 vs. 57 years in the SDM group, p == 0.82, 79% were male vs. 61%, p == 0.23. In both groups 74% had blood pressure ≥≥ 130/85 mmHg, p == 1.00. In both groups 90% had BMI ≥≥ 25, p == 1.00, and about half in both groups had BMI ≥≥ 30, p == 0.56. In the KDM group 63% had dyslipidaemia (low HDL cholesterol or elevated triglycerides) vs. 80% in the SDM group, p == 0.32. Median levels of plasminogen-activator-inhibitor (PAI-1), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), as well as fibrinogen and C-reactive protein (CRP) were without statistically significant differences in the two groups, p > 0.1. In contrast, in markers of glycaemic regulation statistically significant differences were found between groups. Median HbA1 was 8.0 vs. 6.5, p < 0.001. Median fasting whole blood glucose level was 8.8 mmol/L vs. 6.3 mmol/L, p < 0.001, and glucose at two hours during OGTT was 16.9 mmol/L vs. 11.2 mmol/L, p < 0.001. Median fasting serum insulin level was 52 pmol/L vs. 80 pmol/L, p == 0.039 and at two hours 127 pmol/L vs. 479 pmol/L, p < 0.001. Conclusions. The CVD risk-factor profile of SDM patients was similar to the expected adverse profile of patients with KDM. This indicates an already increased risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients before the diabetes becomes clinically manifest, supporting the need for early diagnosis.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N