Comparison of the kinematic features between the in vivo active and passive flexion-extension of the subaxial cervical spine and their biomechanical implications.

Study Design: An in vivo motion analysis of active and passive kinematic cervical flexion-extension. Objective: The study was aimed at investigating the differences between the active and passive kinematic sagittal motions of the subaxial cervical spine. Summary Of Background Data: The biomechanical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Spine (03622436) Vol. 36; no. 8; pp. 630 - 639
Autores principales: Hsu WH, Chen YL, Lui TN, Chen TY, Hsu YH, Lin CL, Ming-Lun T, Hsu, Wen-Hsing, Chen, Yao-Liang, Lui, Tai-Ngar, Chen, Tzu-Yung, Hsu, Yung-Hsin, Lin, Chih-Lung, Ming-Lun, Tsai
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2011 Apr 15
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104904556&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104904556
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03622436
        1Y6
      jtl: Spine (03622436)
      issn: 03622436
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2011 Apr 15
      vid: 36
      iid: 8
      pid: 433
      pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      place: Baltimore, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104904556
        104904556
        NLM21178845
        2011063220
        10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181da79af
        NLM21178845
        104904556
      ppf: 630
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Comparison of the kinematic features between the in vivo active and passive flexion-extension of the subaxial cervical spine and their biomechanical implications.
      aug:
        au:
          Hsu WH
          Chen YL
          Lui TN
          Chen TY
          Hsu YH
          Lin CL
          Ming-Lun T
          Hsu, Wen-Hsing
          Chen, Yao-Liang
          Lui, Tai-Ngar
          Chen, Tzu-Yung
          Hsu, Yung-Hsin
          Lin, Chih-Lung
          Ming-Lun, Tsai
        affil: Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
      sug:
        subj:
          Cervical Vertebrae Physiopathology
          Cervical Vertebrae Radiography
          Range of Motion
          Spinal Diseases Physiopathology
          Adult
          Biomechanics
          Cadaver
          Cervical Vertebrae Surgery
          Female
          Fluoroscopy
          Human
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging
          Male
          Middle Age
          Spinal Diseases Surgery
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Study Design: An in vivo motion analysis of active and passive kinematic cervical flexion-extension. Objective: The study was aimed at investigating the differences between the active and passive kinematic sagittal motions of the subaxial cervical spine. Summary Of Background Data: The biomechanical behavior of the cadaver spinal column is different from that of the in vivo spine. Two major issues were concerned: the complex neuromuscular control of the in vivo cervical spinal motion and the unknown true nature of the passive cervical spinal motion. The kinematic characteristics of active and passive spinal motions need to be clarified. Methods: The active and passive motion patterns of the subaxial spine in the sagittal plane were recorded by digital video fluoroscopy. The motion of functional units from C3-C4 to C6-C7 of the cervical spine were processed using Image J, an image processing software, in both active and passive cervical motions. The Cobb's angle was measured in serial flexion and extension motions, and a comparison of this angle in both active and passive motions was made in 12 patients with degenerative disc herniation. Results: The difference between active and passive gentle flexion was minimal, and the degree of their correlation was high. The differences in the degree of gentle extension between active and passive motion were variable, and their correlation was low. During early passive flexion, the degree of flexion at the upper level was less and that at the lower level was more as compared to that observed at the respective levels in early active flexion. Conclusion: In gentle flexion, the active and passive cervical spinal motions are closely approximated, which implies that the active neuromuscular control mainly plays the buffer-and-brake mechanism without placing additional load on the spine. In contrast, the degree of passive extension is limited, and active neuromuscular control may place additional load on the spine.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N