Contributions of optical and non-optical blur to variation in visual acuity.

Purpose: To determine the relative contributions of optical and non-optical sources of intrinsic blur to variations in visual acuity (VA) among normally sighted subjects.Methods: Best-corrected VA of 16 normally sighted subjects was measured using briefly presented (59 ms) tumbling E optotypes that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Optometry & Vision Science Vol. 88; no. 6; pp. 716 - 724
Autores principales: McAnany JJ, Shahidi M, Applegate RA, Zelkha R, Alexander KR, McAnany, J Jason, Shahidi, Mahnaz, Applegate, Raymond A, Zelkha, Ruth, Alexander, Kenneth R
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell 2011 Jun
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104905476&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104905476
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10405488
        1X24
      jtl: Optometry & Vision Science
      issn: 10405488
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2011 Jun
      vid: 88
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104905476
        104905476
        NLM21460756
        2011064258
        10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182147202
        NLM21460756
        PMC3100362
        104905476
      ppf: 716
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Contributions of optical and non-optical blur to variation in visual acuity.
      aug:
        au:
          McAnany JJ
          Shahidi M
          Applegate RA
          Zelkha R
          Alexander KR
          McAnany, J Jason
          Shahidi, Mahnaz
          Applegate, Raymond A
          Zelkha, Ruth
          Alexander, Kenneth R
        affil: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Astigmatism Physiopathology
          Visual Acuity
          Diagnosis, Eye
          Adult
          Eyeglasses
          Female
          Male
          Middle Age
          Physical Stimulation Methods
          Psychophysics Methods
          Neural Pathways Physiopathology
          Young Adult
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Purpose: To determine the relative contributions of optical and non-optical sources of intrinsic blur to variations in visual acuity (VA) among normally sighted subjects.Methods: Best-corrected VA of 16 normally sighted subjects was measured using briefly presented (59 ms) tumbling E optotypes that were either unblurred or blurred through convolution with Gaussian functions of different widths. A standard model of intrinsic blur was used to estimate each subject's equivalent intrinsic blur (σint) and VA for the unblurred tumbling E (MAR0). For 14 subjects, a radially averaged optical point spread function due to higher-order aberrations was derived by Shack-Hartmann aberrometry and fit with a Gaussian function. The standard deviation of the best-fit Gaussian function defined optical blur (σopt). An index of non-optical blur (η) was defined as 1 - σopt/σint. A control experiment was conducted on five subjects to evaluate the effect of stimulus duration on MAR0 and σint. RESULTS.: The logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR₀) for the briefly presented E was correlated significantly with log σint (r = 0.95, p < 0.01), consistent with previous work. However, logMAR₀ was not correlated significantly with log σopt (r = 0.46, p = 0.11). For subjects with logMAR₀ equivalent to ~20/20 or better, logMAR₀ was independent of log η, whereas for subjects with larger logMAR₀ values, logMAR₀ was proportional to log η. The control experiment showed a statistically significant effect of stimulus duration on logMAR₀ (p < 0.01) but a non-significant effect on σint (p = 0.13).Conclusions: The relative contributions of optical and non-optical blur to VA varied among the subjects and were related to the subject's VA. Evaluating optical and non-optical blur may be useful for predicting changes in VA following procedures that improve the optics of the eye in patients with both optical and non-optical sources of VA loss.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N