Interrater reliability for the Four Habits Coding Scheme as part of a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the process for developing interrater reliability (IRR) for the Four Habits Coding Scheme (4HCS) for a heterogeneous material as part of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Videotapes from 497 hospital encounters involving 71 doctors from most clinical specialties were col...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Patient Education & Counseling Vol. 80; no. 3; pp. 405 - 410
Autores principales: Fossli Jensen B, Gulbrandsen P, Benth JS, Dahl FA, Krupat E, Finset A
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Sep2010
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To describe the process for developing interrater reliability (IRR) for the Four Habits Coding Scheme (4HCS) for a heterogeneous material as part of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Videotapes from 497 hospital encounters involving 71 doctors from most clinical specialties were collected. Four experienced psychology students were trained as raters. We calculated Pearson's r and the intraclass correlation (ICC) on the total score across consecutive samples of twenty videos, and Pearson's r on single videos across items in the initial coding phase. RESULTS: After 18h of training and one rating session, the total score Pearson's r and ICC exceeded .70 for all pairs of raters. Across items within single videos, the Pearson's r was never below 0.60 after the first 50 videos. At item and habit level Pearson's r remained unsatisfactory for some rater pairs mostly due to low variance on some items. CONCLUSION: Based on the evaluation of the effect of communication skills training via a total score, IRR was satisfactory for the 4HCS as applied to heterogeneous material. However, good reliability at item level was difficult to achieve. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: 4HCS may be used as an outcome measure for clinical communication skills in randomized controlled trials.