Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domain names and definitions revisions: further evaluation of content validity in IRT-derived item banks.
Purpose: Content validity of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is evaluated primarily during item development, but subsequent psychometric analyses, particularly for item response theory (IRT)-derived scales, often result in considerable item pruning and potential loss of content. After selecting ite...
| Publicado en: | Quality of Life Research Vol. 19; no. 9; pp. 1311 - 1322 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Nov2010
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104934201&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104934201 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09629343 GPQ jtl: Quality of Life Research issn: 09629343 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2010 vid: 19 iid: 9 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 104934201 NLM20593306 2010841127 10.1007/s11136-010-9694-5 NLM20593306 PMC3670674 104934201 ppf: 1311 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domain names and definitions revisions: further evaluation of content validity in IRT-derived item banks. aug: au: Riley WT Rothrock N Bruce B Christodolou C Cook K Hahn EA Cella D Riley, William T Rothrock, Nan Bruce, Bonnie Christodolou, Christopher Cook, Karon Hahn, Elizabeth A Cella, David affil: National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Dr., MSC 7936, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA sug: subj: Information Systems Outcome Assessment Administration Adolescence Adult Child Child, Preschool Databases Female Human Male Middle Age Psychometrics Quality of Life Questionnaires Self Disclosure Young Adult Adolescent: 13-18 years Adult: 19-44 years Child: 6-12 years Child, Preschool: 2-5 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Female Male ab: Purpose: Content validity of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is evaluated primarily during item development, but subsequent psychometric analyses, particularly for item response theory (IRT)-derived scales, often result in considerable item pruning and potential loss of content. After selecting items for the PROMIS banks based on psychometric and content considerations, we invited external content expert reviews of the degree to which the initial domain names and definitions represented the calibrated item bank content.Methods: A minimum of four content experts reviewed each item bank and recommended a domain name and definition based on item content. Domain names and definitions then were revealed to the experts who rated how well these names and definitions fit the bank content and provided recommendations for definition revisions.Results: These reviews indicated that the PROMIS domain names and definitions remained generally representative of bank content following item pruning, but modifications to two domain names and minor to moderate revisions of all domain definitions were needed to optimize fit with the item bank content.Conclusions: This reevaluation of domain names and definitions following psychometric item pruning, although not previously documented in the literature, appears to be an important procedure for refining conceptual frameworks and further supporting content validity. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|