Detecting hedge cues and their scope in biomedical text with conditional random fields.

Objective: Hedging is frequently used in both the biological literature and clinical notes to denote uncertainty or speculation. It is important for text-mining applications to detect hedge cues and their scope; otherwise, uncertain events are incorrectly identified as factual events. However, due t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Biomedical Informatics Vol. 43; no. 6; pp. 953 - 962
Autores principales: Agarwal S, Yu H, Agarwal, Shashank, Yu, Hong
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Academic Press Inc. Dec2010
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104951971&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104951971
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15320464
        OMB
      jtl: Journal of Biomedical Informatics
      issn: 15320464
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2010
      vid: 43
      iid: 6
      pid: 735
      pub: Academic Press Inc.
      place: Burlington, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104951971
        NLM20709188
        2010866509
        10.1016/j.jbi.2010.08.003
        NLM20709188
        PMC2991497
        104951971
      ppf: 953
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Detecting hedge cues and their scope in biomedical text with conditional random fields.
      aug:
        au:
          Agarwal S
          Yu H
          Agarwal, Shashank
          Yu, Hong
        affil: Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Algorithms
          Data Mining Methods
          Artificial Intelligence
          Natural Language Processing
          Information Science
          Vocabulary, Controlled
      ab: Objective: Hedging is frequently used in both the biological literature and clinical notes to denote uncertainty or speculation. It is important for text-mining applications to detect hedge cues and their scope; otherwise, uncertain events are incorrectly identified as factual events. However, due to the complexity of language, identifying hedge cues and their scope in a sentence is not a trivial task. Our objective was to develop an algorithm that would automatically detect hedge cues and their scope in biomedical literature.Methodology: We used conditional random fields (CRFs), a supervised machine-learning algorithm, to train models to detect hedge cue phrases and their scope in biomedical literature. The models were trained on the publicly available BioScope corpus. We evaluated the performance of the CRF models in identifying hedge cue phrases and their scope by calculating recall, precision and F1-score. We compared our models with three competitive baseline systems.Results: Our best CRF-based model performed statistically better than the baseline systems, achieving an F1-score of 88% and 86% in detecting hedge cue phrases and their scope in biological literature and an F1-score of 93% and 90% in detecting hedge cue phrases and their scope in clinical notes.Conclusions: Our approach is robust, as it can identify hedge cues and their scope in both biological and clinical text. To benefit text-mining applications, our system is publicly available as a Java API and as an online application at http://hedgescope.askhermes.org. To our knowledge, this is the first publicly available system to detect hedge cues and their scope in biomedical literature.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N