Animated Toys Versus Video Reinforcement in 16--24-Month-Old Children in a Clinical Setting.
Purpose: To compare the clinical efficacy of visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) with animated toy animal reinforcement (AVRA) to the efficacy of VRA with video reinforcement (VVRA) in children age 16 to 24 months in a fast-paced medical practice. Method: The 145 participants (age 16 to 24 months)...
| Publicado en: | American Journal of Audiology Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 91 - 100 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Dec2010
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104956472&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104956472 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10590889 5KS jtl: American Journal of Audiology issn: 10590889 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2010 vid: 19 iid: 2 pid: 42 pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association place: Rockville, Maryland artinfo: ui: 104956472 55595318 10.1044/1059-0889(2010/10-0009) NLM20538954 104956472 ppf: 91 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Animated Toys Versus Video Reinforcement in 16--24-Month-Old Children in a Clinical Setting. aug: au: Karzon RK Banerjee P affil: St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MOWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis sug: subj: Reinforcement (Psychology) In Infancy and Childhood Play and Playthings Audiometry Hearing Disorders Diagnosis Human Videorecording Infant Child, Preschool Descriptive Statistics T-Tests Missouri Linear Regression Analysis of Variance Hearing Tests Infant: 1-23 months Child, Preschool: 2-5 years ab: Purpose: To compare the clinical efficacy of visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) with animated toy animal reinforcement (AVRA) to the efficacy of VRA with video reinforcement (VVRA) in children age 16 to 24 months in a fast-paced medical practice. Method: The 145 participants (age 16 to 24 months) were referred by either their primary care physician or an otolaryngology practitioner (physician or nurse practitioner) for audiologic assessment. Children were assigned in a counterbalanced manner to either the AVRA or VVRA group. Results: Significantly more threshold estimates were obtained with AVRA (M = 5.52) than with VVRA (M = 3.47). There were no significant differences in performance based on age, hearing status, or gender. Conclusions: Number and relative strength of the visual reinforcers used are posited as the main reasons for the disparate outcomes. Clinical practices that test large numbers of children with VRA would be well-served to have both AVRA and VVRA available to meet the needs of individual patients. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|