The influence of gender, hand dominance, and upper extremity length on motor evoked potentials.

Unlabelled: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are susceptible to several sources of variability including gender, hand dominance, and upper extremity length. Conflicting evidence on the relationship between MEPs and subject characteristics has bee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing Vol. 24; no. 6; pp. 427 - 437
Autores principales: Livingston SC, Goodkin HP, Ingersoll CD, Livingston, Scott C, Goodkin, Howard P, Ingersoll, Christopher D
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2010
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105002127&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105002127
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13871307
        OHC
      jtl: Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing
      issn: 13871307
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2010
      vid: 24
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105002127
        57361090
        NLM21110222
        2010926430
        10.1007/s10877-010-9267-8
        NLM21110222
        105002127
      ppf: 427
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: The influence of gender, hand dominance, and upper extremity length on motor evoked potentials.
      aug:
        au:
          Livingston SC
          Goodkin HP
          Ingersoll CD
          Livingston, Scott C
          Goodkin, Howard P
          Ingersoll, Christopher D
        affil: Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Wethington 204C, Lexington, KY 40536-0200, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Arm Anatomy and Histology
          Evoked Potentials, Motor Physiology
          Dominance, Cerebral Physiology
          Hand Physiology
          Movement Physiology
          Diagnosis, Neurologic Methods
          Arm Physiology
          Female
          Human
          Male
          Models, Biological
          Sex Factors
          Young Adult
          Female
          Male
      ab: Unlabelled: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are susceptible to several sources of variability including gender, hand dominance, and upper extremity length. Conflicting evidence on the relationship between MEPs and subject characteristics has been reported.Objective: The purposes of this study were to determine if MEPs are different between genders and between right- and left-hand dominant subjects, and to determine if MEPs are correlated with upper extremity length.Methods: Using a case-control design, we recorded MEPs from 45 healthy subjects (age 21.6 ± 2.0 years; 24 females, 21 males) with a MagStim200 stimulating coil positioned over the primary motor cortex. Evoked responses were recorded by surface EMG electrodes from the abductor pollicis brevis, abductor digiti minimi and first dorsal interosseous muscles contralateral to the site of TMS. Evoked responses were analyzed to determine motor thresholds, latencies and amplitudes. Central motor conduction time (CMCT) was estimated from MEP, M response, and F wave latencies.Results: Gender and hand dominance did not significantly influence thresholds, MEP amplitudes, or CMCT (P > .05). MEP latencies were moderately correlated with upper extremity length (R = .62 right median, R = .50 left median, R = .45 right ulnar, R = .51 left ulnar MEP latency, P < .01). An ANCOVA using upper extremity length as the covariate demonstrated no significant differences between genders (Wilk's λ = .89, F = 2.45, P = .10). After adjusting MEP latencies to upper limb length, no significant differences were observed between dominant and non-dominant limbs (F = .002, P = .97 median, and F = .03, P = .56 ulnar) nor between genders (F = 2.7, P = .11 median; F = .05, P = .82 ulnar).Conclusions: Variability in MEP latencies between genders was due to differences in upper extremity length. Adjusting MEP latencies to upper limb length is recommended for more accurate comparison and meaningful interpretation between subjects. Hand dominance and gender do not significantly influence motor thresholds, MEP amplitude, or CMCT.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N