Psychological measurement for specialists in group work.
Recent articles in The Journal for Specialists in Group Work have discussed credibility indicators for quantitative and qualitative studies (Asner-Self, 2009; Rubel & Villalba, 2009). This article extends upon these contributions by discussing measurement issues that are relevant to producers and co...
| Publicado en: | Journal for Specialists in Group Work Vol. 35; no. 4; pp. 331 - 349 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | equations & formulas tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Dec2010
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105006940&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 105006940 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01933922 JGW jtl: Journal for Specialists in Group Work issn: 01933922 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2010 vid: 35 iid: 4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 105006940 2010833269 10.1080/01933922.2010.514978 105006940 ppf: 331 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Psychological measurement for specialists in group work. aug: au: Marley SC affil: University of New Mexico sug: subj: Health Personnel Psychology Evaluation Support Groups Weights and Measures Mathematics Methods Professional Practice, Evidence-Based Quantitative Studies Reliability Statistics Methods Validity ab: Recent articles in The Journal for Specialists in Group Work have discussed credibility indicators for quantitative and qualitative studies (Asner-Self, 2009; Rubel & Villalba, 2009). This article extends upon these contributions by discussing measurement issues that are relevant to producers and consumers of quantitative group research. This article is necessary as measurement quality is directly associated with research credibility. The topics of reliability and validity along with credibility indicators for measures are discussed. This is followed by a description of the statistical assumption of independent measurements in relationship to group research. Implications for research and practice are provided. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: equations & formulas tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|