Imagen de Portada
Código QR

Sex, romance, and research subjects: an ethical exploration.

Professional standards in medicine and psychology treat concurrent sexual relationships with patients as violations of fiduciary trust, and they sometimes rule out sexual relationships even after a clinical relationship is over. These standards also rule out sex with research subjects who are also p...

Descripción completa

Publicado en:American Journal of Bioethics Vol. 10; no. 7; pp. 30 - 39
Autor principal: Murphy TF
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jul2010
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105046082&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105046082
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15265161
        FKZ
      jtl: American Journal of Bioethics
      issn: 15265161
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2010
      vid: 10
      iid: 7
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105046082
        2010704925
        10.1080/15265161.2010.485672
        NLM20582827
        105046082
      ppf: 30
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Sex, romance, and research subjects: an ethical exploration.
      aug:
        au: Murphy TF
        affil: Professor of Philosophy in the Biomedical Sciences, Department of Medical Education m/c 51, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, 808 S. Wood St., Chicago, IL 60612-7309, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Research Ethics
          Research Personnel Ethical Issues
          Research Subjects Ethical Issues
          Researcher-Subject Relations Ethical Issues
          Sexuality Ethical Issues
          Adult
          Bias (Research)
          Dating
          Female
          Fiduciary Duty
          Institutional Review
          Licensure
          Male
          Power
          Professional Misconduct
          Scientists
          Sexual Harassment
          Sexual Partners
          Trust
          United States
          Validity
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Professional standards in medicine and psychology treat concurrent sexual relationships with patients as violations of fiduciary trust, and they sometimes rule out sexual relationships even after a clinical relationship is over. These standards also rule out sex with research subjects who are also patients, but what about nonclinical relationships where there are not always parallels to the standards of clinical medicine? One way to treat sex in nonclinical research relationships is to treat it as sex is treated elsewhere among adults, as a matter of individual choice and responsibility. Alternately, one could ask oversight bodies to draw lines between research that can safely accommodate sexual relationships and research that cannot. One could even ask researchers to avoid all concurrent sexual relationships with their research participants, as happens in clinical medicine. Each of these options has drawbacks that undermine its value as a definitive solution. The deficiencies of these options highlight the need for a professional code of conduct for nonclinical researchers.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N