Assistive technology: a compensatory strategy for work production post mild brain injury.

This case study describes the changes in the quantity of work production of a 32 year-old male paralegal secondary to a mild brain injury from a racquetball racket blow to the frontal lobe area. The case illustrates how a work analysis can serve as an effective evaluation tool and how the utilizatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Work Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 399 - 405
Autor principal: Hartmann KD
Formato: case study tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. 2010
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105082894&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105082894
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10519815
        3RC
      jtl: Work
      issn: 10519815
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2010
      vid: 36
      iid: 4
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105082894
        105082894
        2010753838
        10.3233/WOR-2010-1048
        NLM20714095
        105082894
      ppf: 399
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Assistive technology: a compensatory strategy for work production post mild brain injury.
      aug:
        au: Hartmann KD
        affil: Quinnipiac University, 200 Squaw Lane, Guilford, CT 06437; hartmann@quinnipiac.edu.
      sug:
        subj:
          Assistive Technology
          Brain Injuries
          Productivity
          Adult
          Male
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
      ab: This case study describes the changes in the quantity of work production of a 32 year-old male paralegal secondary to a mild brain injury from a racquetball racket blow to the frontal lobe area. The case illustrates how a work analysis can serve as an effective evaluation tool and how the utilization of assistive technology can circumvent executive functioning challenges and improve work production and client self-reported self-esteem. This evaluative and intervention process may be highly effective in mild-brain injury where executive functioning disorders cannot be identified through typical methods. Yet a detailed comparison of work productivity pre and post injury through work samples, interviews, and observations may be a powerful system to differentiate changes in executive functioning.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        case study
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N