Protecting the integrity of forensic psychological testing: a reply to geffner, et al. (2009)
Recommendations regarding psychological test use made by Geffner, Conradi, Geis, and Aranda (2009) directly contradict well established standards of practice, guidelines promulgated by several professional organizations, and well-known legal standards regarding the admissibility of evidence in Court...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Child Custody Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 78 - 93 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | commentary Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jan-Mar2010
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |