Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas.
Background Collaboration with patients in healthcare and medical research is an emerging development. We aimed to develop a methodology for health research agenda setting processes grounded in the notion of participation as dialogue. Methods We conducted seven case studies between 2003 and 2007 to d...
| Published in: | Health Expectations Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 160 - 174 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jun2010
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105202782&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 105202782 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 13696513 EVY jtl: Health Expectations issn: 13696513 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2010 vid: 13 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 105202782 2010657079 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x NLM20536537 105202782 ppf: 160 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas. aug: au: Abma TA Broerse JEW affil: VU Medical Center, EMGO institute, Department of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam, The Netherlands sug: subj: Consumer Participation Professional-Patient Relations Research Methodology Focus Groups Models, Theoretical Questionnaires Reflection Thematic Analysis ab: Background Collaboration with patients in healthcare and medical research is an emerging development. We aimed to develop a methodology for health research agenda setting processes grounded in the notion of participation as dialogue. Methods We conducted seven case studies between 2003 and 2007 to develop and validate a Dialogue Model for patient participation in health research agenda setting. The case studies related to spinal cord injury, neuromuscular diseases, renal failure, asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, burns, diabetes and intellectual disabilities. Results The Dialogue Model is grounded in participatory and interactive approaches and has been adjusted on the basis of pilot work. It has six phases: exploration; consultation; prioritization; integration; programming; and implementation. These phases are discussed and illustrated with a case description of research agenda setting relating to burns. Conclusions The dialogue model appeared relevant and feasible to structure the process of collaboration between stakeholders in several research agenda setting processes. The phase of consultation enables patients to develop their own voice and agenda, and prepares them for the broader collaboration with other stakeholder groups. Challenges include the stimulation of more permanent changes in research, and institutional transitions. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|