Understanding statistical significance.
BACKGROUND: Statistical significance is often misinterpreted as proof or scientific evidence of importance. This article addresses the most common statistical reporting error in the biomedical literature, namely, confusing statistical significance with clinical importance. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this...
| Published in: | Nursing Research Vol. 59; no. 3; pp. 219 - 224 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
May/Jun2010
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105210210&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 105210210 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00296562 1HA jtl: Nursing Research issn: 00296562 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May/Jun2010 vid: 59 iid: 3 pid: 433 pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins place: Baltimore, Maryland artinfo: ui: 105210210 2010666776 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181dbb2cc NLM20445438 105210210 ppf: 219 ppct: 5 formats: tig: atl: Understanding statistical significance. aug: au: Hayat MJ affil: School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. mhayat2@son.jhmi.edu sug: subj: Data Analysis, Statistical Statistical Significance Confidence Intervals Effect Size Null Hypothesis Sample Size ab: BACKGROUND: Statistical significance is often misinterpreted as proof or scientific evidence of importance. This article addresses the most common statistical reporting error in the biomedical literature, namely, confusing statistical significance with clinical importance. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to clarify the confusion between statistical significance and clinical importance by providing a historical perspective of significance testing, presenting a correct understanding of the information given by p values and significance testing, and offering recommendations for the correct use and reporting of statistical results. APPROACH: The correct interpretation of p values and statistical significance is given, and the recommendations provided include a description of the current recommended guidelines for statistical reporting of the size of an effect. RESULTS: This article provides a comprehensive overview of p values and significance testing and an understanding of the need for measures of importance and magnitude in statistical reporting. DISCUSSION: Statistical significance is not an objective measure and does not provide an escape from the requirement for the researcher to think carefully and judge the clinical and practical importance of a study's results. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|