An evaluation of the construct validity of the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration using the Rasch Measurement Model.

Background: One method of evaluating the construct validity of instruments is the Rasch Measurement Model (RMM), an increasingly popular method used for test construction and validation. Aim: The aim was to examine the construct validity of the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration 5th Edit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Australian Occupational Therapy Journal Vol. 56; no. 6; pp. 393 - 403
Autores principales: Brown T, Unsworth C, Lyons C
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2009
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105239884&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105239884
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00450766
        FQP
      jtl: Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
      issn: 00450766
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2009
      vid: 56
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105239884
        44964865
        44964865
        10.1111/j.1440-1630.2009.00811.x
        NLM20854550
        105239884
      ppf: 393
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: An evaluation of the construct validity of the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration using the Rasch Measurement Model.
      aug:
        au:
          Brown T
          Unsworth C
          Lyons C
        affil: School of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Clinical Assessment Tools Evaluation
          Instrument Validation
          Pediatric Occupational Therapy
          Sensory Motor Integration Evaluation
          Child
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Concurrent Validity
          Construct Validity
          Convenience Sample
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Data Analysis Software
          Factor Analysis
          Funding Source
          Goodness of Fit Chi Square Test
          Prospective Studies
          Rasch Analysis
          Scales
          Validation Studies
          Victoria
          Child: 6-12 years
      ab: Background: One method of evaluating the construct validity of instruments is the Rasch Measurement Model (RMM), an increasingly popular method used for test construction and validation. Aim: The aim was to examine the construct validity of the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration 5th Edition (VMI) by applying the RMM to evaluate its scalability, dimensionality, differential item functioning and hierarchical ordering. Method: The participants were 400 children aged 5 to 12 years, recruited from six schools in Melbourne, Victoria, who completed the VMI under the supervision of an occupational therapist. VMI items 1, 2 and 3 were excluded from the Rasch analysis since all of the children achieved a perfect score on these items. Results: None of the items exhibited RMM misfit due to goodness-of-fit mean square (MnSq) infit statistics and standardised z (ZStd) scores being outside the specified acceptable range. VMI item 9 (copied circle) exhibited differential item functioning based on gender. In relation to hierarchical ordering of items, several were found to have similar logit difficulty values. For example, VMI items 26, 27 and 29; items 18, 22 and 24; and items 4, 5 and 11 were found to have the same level of challenge. As well, the VMI scale item logit measure order did not match that presented in the VMI test manual. Conclusion: Theoretically, the VMI items are developmentally ordered; however, this ordering was not mirrored by the item logit difficulty scores obtained. This has scoring implications, where scoring a respondent's VMI test booklet is terminated after three consecutive items are not passed. Clinicians should also be aware that item 9 may exhibit bias related to gender.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N