Primary prevention of atrial fibrillation: does the atrial lead position influence the incidence of atrial arrhythmias in patients with sinus node dysfunction? Results from the PASTA trial...pacing of the atria in sinus node disease

Introduction: PASTA (pacing of the atria in sinus node disease) is a prospective and randomized trial, assessing the effect of different atrial lead positions on the atrial fibrillation (AF) incidence in patients with sinus node disease (SND). Method: The atrial lead position is randomized to: (a) f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology Vol. 32; no. 12; pp. 1553 - 1562
Autores principales: Spitzer SG, Wacker P, Gazarek S, Malinowski K, Schibgilla V
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2009
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: PASTA (pacing of the atria in sinus node disease) is a prospective and randomized trial, assessing the effect of different atrial lead positions on the atrial fibrillation (AF) incidence in patients with sinus node disease (SND). Method: The atrial lead position is randomized to: (a) free right atrial wall, (b) right atrial appendage (RAA), (c) coronary sinus ostium (CS-Os), or (d) dual site right atrial pacing (CS-Os + RAA). The pacemakers (Vitatron Selection 9000 or Prevent AF, Vitatron B.V., Arnhem, The Netherlands) are programmed in DDDR 70 mode and the total follow-up duration is 24 months. To describe the atrial rhythm state, pacemaker-derived data (arrhythmia counter) were assessed for AF episodes. AF was considered as evident, if the AF burden (time in AF related to follow-up interval) was >1% (i.e., 15 min/d). Follow-up data after 24 months were evaluated. Results: The analysis evaluates 142 patients (77 male, 74.5 ± 7.8 years). There was no statistical significant difference with respect to the occurrence of AF between the four groups after 24 months (A: 36%; B: 38%, C: 32%, D: 48%). The percentage of atrial/ventricular pacing was in A: 78/76%, in B: 84/81%, in C: 70/65%, and in D: 79/69%. These differences were not significant. Conclusion: The evaluation of the AF burden >1% and the total AF burden after 24 months did not show differences in the incidence of AF in patients with dual chamber pacemaker therapy for SND. We were not able to demonstrate a significant influence of right atrial lead position on the incidence of AF recurrence.