Reliability and accuracy of practitioner-calculated Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores for determining the appropriateness of drotrecogin alfa (activated)

PURPOSE: The reliability and accuracy of practitioner-calculated Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores for determining the appropriateness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in critically ill patients were evaluated. METHODS: Three adjudicated clinical cases of sepsis were d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy Vol. 67; no. 2; pp. 136 - 144
Autores principales: Owen PS, Tan EC, Kiser TH, Fish DN, MacLaren R
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA 1/15/2010
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105293899&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105293899
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10792082
        1X3
      jtl: American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
      issn: 10792082
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 1/15/2010
      vid: 67
      iid: 2
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105293899
        105293899
        2010534352
        10.2146/ajhp090186
        NLM20065268
        105293899
      ppf: 136
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Reliability and accuracy of practitioner-calculated Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores for determining the appropriateness of drotrecogin alfa (activated)
      aug:
        au:
          Owen PS
          Tan EC
          Kiser TH
          Fish DN
          MacLaren R
        affil: Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Center, Mercer University (MU), Atlanta, GA
      sug:
        subj:
          Decision Making, Clinical
          Recombinant Proteins Therapeutic Use
          Sepsis Drug Therapy
          Academic Medical Centers
          APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation)
          Case Studies
          Chi Square Test
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Colorado
          Data Analysis Software
          Descriptive Statistics
          Fisher's Exact Test
          Glasgow Coma Scale
          Human
          Interrater Reliability
          Intrarater Reliability
          kappa Statistic
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Physicians
          Scales
          Validity
          Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
          Yates' Continuity Correction
      ab: PURPOSE: The reliability and accuracy of practitioner-calculated Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores for determining the appropriateness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in critically ill patients were evaluated. METHODS: Three adjudicated clinical cases of sepsis were developed using composites of real patient scenarios. The patients' APACHE II scores were independently assessed by randomly selected critical care practitioners (physicians and nonphysicians). Each case contained at least one reason to consider withholding drotrecogin alfa (activated), but none had a definitive contraindication to drotrecogin alfa (activated). Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were assessed using kappa correlation. Accuracy was assessed by comparing median scores to the adjudicated scores and evaluating correctly classified APACHE II scores. RESULTS: A total of 21 (42%) physicians and 14 (56%) nonphysicians completed all assessments. Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were 0.16 and 0.49 for the total APACHE II score, respectively. Median calculated APACHE II scores significantly differed for case 1 (p = 0.003) and case 3 (p < 0.0001). The percentage of error in calculating the total APACHE II score approached 85%. The main reasons for administering drotrecogin alfa (activated) were an APACHE II score of >or=25 and multiple organ failures. The main reason for therapy was a high bleeding risk or an APACHE II score of <25. CONCLUSION: Weak intraobserver agreement, modest interobserver reliability, a high error rate, and low accuracy limited the clinical application of the APACHE II score by untrained practitioners, indicating that the APACHE II score should not be the only determinant for the use of drotrecogin alfa (activated).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N