Improving rehabilitation treatment in a local setting: a case study of prosthetic rehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE: To contribute to the discussion on the research-practice gap by illustrating obstacles and opportunities that arise in an evidence-informed improvement process of prosthetic rehabilitation in a local setting. SETTING: Dutch rehabilitation centre. PRESUPPOSITION: The improvement process wa...
| Published in: | Clinical Rehabilitation Vol. 23; no. 10; pp. 938 - 948 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | case study pictorial research Journal Article |
| Published: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Oct2009
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105319516&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 105319516 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02692155 31B jtl: Clinical Rehabilitation issn: 02692155 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Oct2009 vid: 23 iid: 10 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 105319516 2010431589 10.1177/0269215509338125 NLM19717507 105319516 ppf: 938 ppct: 10 formats: tig: atl: Improving rehabilitation treatment in a local setting: a case study of prosthetic rehabilitation. aug: au: van Twillert S Postema K Geertzen JHB Hemminga T Lettinga AT affil: Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Haren, The Netherlands; S.van.Twillert@cvr.umcg.nl sug: subj: Amputation Rehabilitation Attitude of Health Personnel Evaluation Quality Improvement Methods Rehabilitation Patients Action Research Age Factors Aged Data Analysis Software Focus Groups Functional Status Funding Source Interviews Limb Prosthesis Multidisciplinary Care Team Netherlands Nurses Occupational Therapists Patient Education Physical Therapists Professional-Patient Relations Psychiatrists Psychologists Quality of Health Care Research Personnel Semi-Structured Interview Social Workers Human Aged: 65+ years ab: OBJECTIVE: To contribute to the discussion on the research-practice gap by illustrating obstacles and opportunities that arise in an evidence-informed improvement process of prosthetic rehabilitation in a local setting. SETTING: Dutch rehabilitation centre. PRESUPPOSITION: The improvement process was considered as a two-way translation process rather than a unidirectional process of knowledge transfer between science and practice. METHOD: Case study and participatory research methods comprising documentary analysis, treatment observations, individual and focus groups interviews, and literature studies. A qualitative software program (Atlas-ti) was used to triangulate the collected data. RESULTS: The main concern of local practitioners was identified to be the post-discharge decline in functional capacity in elderly amputees. This was related to a predominantly biomedical and biomechanical approach, and accompanying traditional therapist-patient interactions. The content and underpinnings of prosthetic treatments were scarcely specified in either the scientific literature or the local setting. Generic principles and practices from other fields were useful for treatment innovation for post-discharge problems, such as task- and context-specific training and self-management education. A circuit training focused on motor learning and a problem-solving training focused on social learning were developed by integrating amputation-specific knowledge. CONCLUSION: Improving rehabilitation practice with the use of available evidence is a heterogeneous and multifaceted scientific enterprise. Such an enterprise requires as much self-reflexivity from researchers as from practitioners. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: case study pictorial research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|