Using National Drug Codes and drug knowledge bases to organize prescription records from multiple sources.
PURPOSE: The utility of National Drug Codes (NDCs) and drug knowledge bases (DKBs) in the organization of prescription records from multiple sources was studied. METHODS: The master files of most pharmacy systems include NDCs and local codes to identify the products they dispense. We obtained a larg...
| Published in: | American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy Vol. 66; no. 19; pp. 1743 - 1754 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press / USA
10/1/2009
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105319628&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 105319628 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10792082 1X3 jtl: American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy issn: 10792082 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 10/1/2009 vid: 66 iid: 19 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 105319628 2010431810 10.2146/ajhp080221 NLM19767382 105319628 ppf: 1743 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Using National Drug Codes and drug knowledge bases to organize prescription records from multiple sources. aug: au: Simonaitis L McDonald CJ affil: Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; lsimonaitis@regenstrief.org sug: subj: Classification Utilization Coding Drugs Classification Knowledge Bases Evaluation Descriptive Statistics Evaluation Research Funding Source Indiana Patient Record Systems Methods Record Review Human ab: PURPOSE: The utility of National Drug Codes (NDCs) and drug knowledge bases (DKBs) in the organization of prescription records from multiple sources was studied. METHODS: The master files of most pharmacy systems include NDCs and local codes to identify the products they dispense. We obtained a large sample of prescription records from seven different sources. These records carried a national product code or a local code that could be translated into a national product code via their formulary master. We obtained mapping tables from five DKBs. We measured the degree to which the DKB mapping tables covered the national product codes carried in or associated with the sample of prescription records. RESULTS: Considering the total prescription volume, DKBs covered 93.0-99.8% of the product codes from three outpatient sources and 77.4-97.0% of the product codes from four inpatient sources. Among the in-patient sources, invented codes explained 36-94% of the noncoverage. Outpatient pharmacy sources rarely invented codes, which comprised only 0.11-0.21% of their total prescription volume, compared with inpatient pharmacy sources for which invented codes comprised 1.7-7.4% of their prescription volume. The distribution of prescribed products was highly skewed, with 1.4-4.4% of codes accounting for 50% of the message volume and 10.7-34.5% accounting for 90% of the message volume. CONCLUSION: DKBs cover the product codes used by outpatient sources sufficiently well to permit automatic mapping. Changes in policies and standards could increase coverage of product codes used by inpatient sources. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|