Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images.

Rationale and Objectives: To investigate the effect of a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system on radiologists' performance in discriminating malignant and benign masses on mammograms and three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) images.Materials and Methods: Our dataset contained mammograms and 3D US...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Academic Radiology Vol. 16; no. 7; pp. 810 - 819
Autores principales: Sahiner B, Chan HP, Hadjiiski LM, Roubidoux MA, Paramagul C, Bailey JE, Nees AV, Blane CE, Adler DD, Patterson SK, Klein KA, Pinsky RW, Helvie MA, Sahiner, Berkman, Chan, Heang-Ping, Hadjiiski, Lubomir M, Roubidoux, Marilyn A, Paramagul, Chintana, Bailey, Janet E, Nees, Alexis V
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Jul2009
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105352766&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105352766
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10766332
        T4X
      jtl: Academic Radiology
      issn: 10766332
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2009
      vid: 16
      iid: 7
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105352766
        NLM19375953
        2010310026
        10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.011
        NLM19375953
        PMC2722036
        105352766
      ppf: 810
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images.
      aug:
        au:
          Sahiner B
          Chan HP
          Hadjiiski LM
          Roubidoux MA
          Paramagul C
          Bailey JE
          Nees AV
          Blane CE
          Adler DD
          Patterson SK
          Klein KA
          Pinsky RW
          Helvie MA
          Sahiner, Berkman
          Chan, Heang-Ping
          Hadjiiski, Lubomir M
          Roubidoux, Marilyn A
          Paramagul, Chintana
          Bailey, Janet E
          Nees, Alexis V
        affil: Department of Radiology, The University of Michigan, MIB C480A, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5842, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Breast Neoplasms Radiography
          Breast Neoplasms Ultrasonography
          Diagnostic Imaging Methods
          Image Interpretation, Computer Assisted Methods
          Mammography Methods
          Adult
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Female
          Middle Age
          Observer Bias
          Reproducibility of Results
          ROC Curve
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Subtraction Technique
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
      ab: Rationale and Objectives: To investigate the effect of a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system on radiologists' performance in discriminating malignant and benign masses on mammograms and three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) images.Materials and Methods: Our dataset contained mammograms and 3D US volumes from 67 women (median age, 51; range: 27-86) with 67 biopsy-proven breast masses (32 benign and 35 malignant). A CADx system was designed to automatically delineate the mass boundaries on mammograms and the US volumes, extract features, and merge the extracted features into a multi-modality malignancy score. Ten experienced readers (subspecialty academic breast imaging radiologists) first viewed the mammograms alone, and provided likelihood of malignancy (LM) ratings and Breast Imaging and Reporting System assessments. Subsequently, the reader viewed the US images with the mammograms, and provided LM and action category ratings. Finally, the CADx score was shown and the reader had the opportunity to revise the ratings. The LM ratings were analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) methodology, and the action category ratings were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of cancer diagnosis.Results: Without CADx, readers' average area under the ROC curve, A(z), was 0.93 (range, 0.86-0.96) for combined assessment of the mass on both the US volume and mammograms. With CADx, their average A(z) increased to 0.95 (range, 0.91-0.98), which was borderline significant (P = .05). The average sensitivity of the readers increased from 98% to 99% with CADx, while the average specificity increased from 27% to 29%. The change in sensitivity with CADx did not achieve statistical significance for the individual radiologists, and the change in specificity was statistically significant for one of the radiologists.Conclusions: A well-trained CADx system that combines features extracted from mammograms and US images may have the potential to improve radiologists' performance in distinguishing malignant from benign breast masses and making decisions about biopsies.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N