Medical grade vs off-the-shelf color displays: influence on observer performance and visual search.

The goal of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of radiologists viewing clinical images on a top-of-the-line medical-grade vs a top-of-the-line commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) color display with the luminance values set to simulate a display that had been in use for 1 year. A set of 50 dig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Digital Imaging Vol. 22; no. 4; pp. 363 - 369
Autor principal: Krupinski EA
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2009
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105381853&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105381853
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08971889
        DOQ
      jtl: Journal of Digital Imaging
      issn: 08971889
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2009
      vid: 22
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105381853
        2010342773
        10.1007/s10278-008-9156-6
        NLM18769964
        105381853
      ppf: 363
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Medical grade vs off-the-shelf color displays: influence on observer performance and visual search.
      aug:
        au: Krupinski EA
        affil: Department of Radiology, University of Arizona, 1609 N. Warren Bldg 211, Rm 112, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA; Krupinski@radiology.arizona.edu
      sug:
        subj:
          Computer Peripherals Evaluation
          Radiography, Computed
          Color
          Comparative Studies
          Confidence Intervals
          Eye Movements
          ROC Curve
          Human
      ab: The goal of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of radiologists viewing clinical images on a top-of-the-line medical-grade vs a top-of-the-line commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) color display with the luminance values set to simulate a display that had been in use for 1 year. A set of 50 digital radiography chest images was selected for use in the study, half containing a solitary pulmonary nodule and half nodule-free. The images were displayed twice to each of six observers, once on each display. Eye position was recorded on a subset of the images. Overall, there was a statistically significant difference (F = 4.1496, p = 0.0471) between the medical-grade color display and the COTS color display in terms of receiver operating characteristic area under the curve values, with the medical-grade display yielding higher diagnostic accuracy. Total viewing time did not differ significantly, but eye position data revealed differences, suggesting better search and decision-making efficiency with the medical-grade display. Medical-grade color displays at 1 year old yield better diagnostic and search efficiency than COTS color displays and thus are recommended for primary reading if color displays are to be used.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N