Efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a report from the North American ARVC Registry.

Objectives: This study sought to examine the efficacy of empiric antiarrhythmic drugs in a rigorously characterized cohort of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients.Background: Antiarrhythmic drugs are important in protecting against ventricular arrhythmias in ARVC, but no s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) Vol. 54; no. 7; pp. 609 - 616
Autores principales: Marcus GM, Glidden DV, Polonsky B, Zareba W, Smith LM, Cannom DS, Estes NA 3rd, Marcus F, Scheinman MM, Marcus, Gregory M, Glidden, David V, Polonsky, Bronislava, Zareba, Wojciech, Smith, Lisa M, Cannom, David S, Estes, N A Mark 3rd, Marcus, Frank, Scheinman, Melvin M
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Aug2009
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105401428&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105401428
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07351097
        20P
      jtl: Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
      issn: 07351097
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2009
      vid: 54
      iid: 7
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105401428
        NLM19660690
        2010364231
        10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.020
        NLM19660690
        PMC2748738
        105401428
      ppf: 609
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a report from the North American ARVC Registry.
      aug:
        au:
          Marcus GM
          Glidden DV
          Polonsky B
          Zareba W
          Smith LM
          Cannom DS
          Estes NA 3rd
          Marcus F
          Scheinman MM
          Marcus, Gregory M
          Glidden, David V
          Polonsky, Bronislava
          Zareba, Wojciech
          Smith, Lisa M
          Cannom, David S
          Estes, N A Mark 3rd
          Marcus, Frank
          Scheinman, Melvin M
        affil: Division of Cardiology, Electrophysiology Section, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-1354, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Adrenergic beta-Antagonists Therapeutic Use
          Antiarrhythmia Agents Therapeutic Use
          Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia Complications
          Tachycardia, Ventricular Prevention and Control
          Ventricular Fibrillation Prevention and Control
          Adult
          Amiodarone Therapeutic Use
          Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia Therapy
          Combined Modality Therapy
          Cox Proportional Hazards Model
          Data Collection
          Defibrillators, Implantable
          Female
          Male
          Middle Age
          Sotalol Therapeutic Use
          Tachycardia, Ventricular Etiology
          Treatment Outcomes
          Ventricular Fibrillation Etiology
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Objectives: This study sought to examine the efficacy of empiric antiarrhythmic drugs in a rigorously characterized cohort of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients.Background: Antiarrhythmic drugs are important in protecting against ventricular arrhythmias in ARVC, but no studies have provided data in a group rigorously screened for the disease.Methods: Antiarrhythmic medicines were examined in all subjects with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) enrolled in the North American ARVC Registry. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to account for time on each drug, and a hierarchical analysis was performed for repeated measures within individuals.Results: Ninety-five patients were studied, with a mean follow-up of 480 +/- 389 days. Fifty-eight (61%) received beta-blockers, and these medicines were not associated with an increased or decreased risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Sotalol was associated with a greater risk of any clinically relevant ventricular arrhythmia as defined by sustained ventricular tachycardia or ICD therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 6.39, p = 0.045), but this was not statistically significant after adjusting for potential confounders. An increased risk of any ICD shock and first clinically relevant ventricular arrhythmia while on sotalol remained significant after multivariable adjustment. Those on amiodarone (n = 10) had a significantly lower risk of any clinically relevant ventricular arrhythmia (HR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.95, p = 0.041), a finding that remained significant after multivariable adjustment.Conclusions: In a cohort of well-characterized ARVC subjects, neither beta-blockers nor sotalol seemed to be protective. Evidence from a small number of patients suggests that amiodarone has superior efficacy in preventing ventricular arrhythmias.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N