Noninvasive ventilation in acute care: controversies and emerging concepts.

This conference brought together experts on noninvasive ventilation (NIV) to discuss and debate the advances in evidence and technology over the past decade. A major impetus for the conference was that many institutions have not systematically integrated NIV into their clinical practice, despite mou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 54; no. 2; pp. 259 - 264
Autor principal: Kallet RH
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Feb2009
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105451048&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105451048
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2009
      vid: 54
      iid: 2
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105451048
        2010192198
        NLM19173757
        105451048
      ppf: 259
      ppct: 5
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Noninvasive ventilation in acute care: controversies and emerging concepts.
      aug:
        au: Kallet RH
        affil: Respiratory Care Services, San Francisco General Hospital, NH:GA-2, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco CA 94110. rkallet@sfghsom.ucsf.edu.
      sug:
        subj:
          Respiration, Artificial Methods
          Respiratory Failure Therapy
          Acute Care
          Positive Pressure Ventilation
          Respiration, Artificial Utilization
      ab: This conference brought together experts on noninvasive ventilation (NIV) to discuss and debate the advances in evidence and technology over the past decade. A major impetus for the conference was that many institutions have not systematically integrated NIV into their clinical practice, despite mounting, high-level evidence supporting its effectiveness. NIV clearly improves outcomes for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema when instituted as a first-line therapy. Although the evidence is less persuasive, initial intervention with NIV also might benefit a carefully selected subset of patients with acute lung injury, as well as those with acute respiratory failure who are immunocompromised. The papers in this and last month's special issue of the Journal provide an informative guide for clinicians attempting to implement NIV in their institutions. This paper summarizes the major findings from each presentation and the discussions that followed.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N