Status of psychological trials in breast cancer patients: a report of three meta-analyses.

This systematic review reports the results of three meta-analyses addressing the clinical efficacy of psychological interventions in breast cancer patients. Three outcome variables were examined: anxiety, depression and quality of life. Several moderator variables were found to both account for inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes Vol. 72; no. 1; pp. 50 - 70
Autores principales: Naaman SC, Radwan K, Fergusson D, Johnson S
Formato: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Spring2009
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105532659&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105532659
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00332747
        PST
      jtl: Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes
      issn: 00332747
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring2009
      vid: 72
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105532659
        2010282666
        10.1521/psyc.2009.72.1.50
        NLM19366294
        105532659
      ppf: 50
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Status of psychological trials in breast cancer patients: a report of three meta-analyses.
      aug:
        au:
          Naaman SC
          Radwan K
          Fergusson D
          Johnson S
        affil: Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; snaaman@ottawaheart.ca
      sug:
        subj:
          Breast Neoplasms Therapy
          Cancer Patients
          Outcome Assessment
          Psychotherapy, Group
          Anxiety
          CINAHL Database
          Coding
          Confidence Intervals
          Data Analysis, Statistical
          Depression
          Effect Size
          Embase
          Female
          Medline
          Meta Analysis
          Psycinfo
          Quality of Life
          Scales
          Human
          Female
      ab: This systematic review reports the results of three meta-analyses addressing the clinical efficacy of psychological interventions in breast cancer patients. Three outcome variables were examined: anxiety, depression and quality of life. Several moderator variables were found to both account for inter-trial heterogeneity and interact with treatment efficacy; methodological quality, prognosis, treatment type, orientation and duration. A clinically moderate treatment effect was found for anxiety (-0.40, 95% CI, -0.72 to -0.08, N = 1278). This was not robust to study quality, but remained stable for patients with more advanced disease. Short-term group therapy was more effective than longer term intervention and individual ones. A clinically moderate-to-strong effect was found in trials assessing depression (-1.01, 95% CI, -1.48 to -0.54, N = 1324). A more robust finding of -0.47 (95% -0.69 to -0.24) was based on methodologically more reliable studies treating patients with high psychological morbidity. Intervention was shown to have moderate effects on improving QOL (0.74, 95% CI, 0.12 to 1.37, N = 623), though it was not robust to study quality. Findings suggest that short-term treatments with a focus on coping may be more suitable for early breast cancer patients. Patients with advanced breast disease appear to benefit more from longer term interventions which emphasize support. Recommendations are also made for future clinical trials.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N