Dose recalculation and the Dose-Guided Radiation Therapy (DGRT) process using megavoltage cone-beam CT.

Purpose: At the University of California San Francisco, daily or weekly three-dimensional images of patients in treatment position are acquired for image-guided radiation therapy. These images can be used for calculating the actual dose delivered to the patient during treatment. In this article, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics Vol. 74; no. 2; pp. 583 - 593
Autores principales: Cheung J, Aubry JF, Yom SS, Gottschalk AR, Celi JC, Pouliot J, Cheung, Joey, Aubry, Jean-François, Yom, Sue S, Gottschalk, Alexander R, Celi, Juan Carlos, Pouliot, Jean
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science Jun2009
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105535461&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105535461
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03603016
        1ZQ
      jtl: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
      issn: 03603016
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2009
      vid: 74
      iid: 2
      pid: 2410
      pub: Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105535461
        NLM19345518
        2010277890
        10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.034
        NLM19345518
        105535461
      ppf: 583
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Dose recalculation and the Dose-Guided Radiation Therapy (DGRT) process using megavoltage cone-beam CT.
      aug:
        au:
          Cheung J
          Aubry JF
          Yom SS
          Gottschalk AR
          Celi JC
          Pouliot J
          Cheung, Joey
          Aubry, Jean-François
          Yom, Sue S
          Gottschalk, Alexander R
          Celi, Juan Carlos
          Pouliot, Jean
        affil: Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, Comprehensive Cancer Center, 94115, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Diagnostic Imaging Methods
          Head and Neck Neoplasms Radiography
          Prostatic Neoplasms Radiography
          Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted Methods
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed Methods
          Aged
          Bladder Radiography
          Brain Stem Radiography
          Calibration
          Computer Terminals
          Genitalia, Male Radiography
          Head and Neck Neoplasms Radiotherapy
          Larynx Radiography
          Male
          Middle Age
          Parotid Gland Radiography
          Prostatic Neoplasms Radiotherapy
          Radiation Dosage
          Radiation Injuries Prevention and Control
          Rectum Radiography
          Spinal Cord Radiography
          Temporomandibular Joint Radiography
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
      ab: Purpose: At the University of California San Francisco, daily or weekly three-dimensional images of patients in treatment position are acquired for image-guided radiation therapy. These images can be used for calculating the actual dose delivered to the patient during treatment. In this article, we present the process of performing dose recalculation on megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography images and discuss possible strategies for dose-guided radiation therapy (DGRT). Materials and Methods: A dedicated workstation has been developed to incorporate the necessary elements of DGRT. Patient image correction (cupping, missing data artifacts), calibration, completion, recontouring, and dose recalculation are all implemented in the workstation. Tools for dose comparison are also included. Examples of image correction and dose analysis using 6 head-and-neck and 2 prostate patient datasets are presented to show possible tracking of interfraction dosimetric endpoint variation over the course of treatment. Results: Analysis of the head-and-neck datasets shows that interfraction treatment doses vary compared with the planning dose for the organs at risk, with the mean parotid dose and spinal cord D(1) increasing by as much as 52% and 10%, respectively. Variation of the coverage to the target volumes was small, with an average D(5) dose difference of 1%. The prostate patient datasets revealed accurate dose coverage to the targeted prostate and varying interfraction dose distributions to the organs at risk. Conclusions: An effective workflow for the clinical implementation of DGRT has been established. With these techniques in place, future clinical developments in adaptive radiation therapy through daily or weekly dosimetric measurements of treatment day images are possible.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N